Home
Page

Key Info

News

9/11

Media

Health

War

Inspiration

Elections

Energy

Mind Control

Other

Subscribe Free

Best
Information

Recent News
Posts

Concise
Summaries

Hidden
Knowledge

News Article
Index

Key Media
Articles

Top
Resources

A New
Paradigm

Online Courses

Reader
Reviews

What You Can
Do

About
Us

Please
Donate

$

Best Free Videos

PBS Documentary

Secret
Government

BBC Documentary

Power of
Nightmares

History Channel

Mind
Control

Discovery Channel

Conspiracy
of Silence

HBO Documentary

Hacking
Democracy

9/11 Documentary

9/11: Press for
Truth

Inspiration

Fluid
Intelligence

Our Great
Hope

Find Life
Purpose

Transform Fear

Quality of
Life

End
Poverty

Moment of Love

Simple Keys to Life

Near-Death
Awakening

Insider
Reveals All

Shifting
Paradigms

Principles
of
Transformation

Information Centers

Online Courses

9/11

Elections

Energy

Health

Inspiration

Mass
Media

Mind
Control

Miscellaneous

UFO
Cover-up

War
Cover-up

Email
Messages

News
Archive

Even
Deeper

Overwhelmed?

9/11
Commission Report
Questioned by Over 100 Professors

Alphabetized
List of Over 100 Professors Questioning 9/11
Commission Report Michael
M. Andregg, PhD - Professor, Justice and Peace
Studies, St. Thomas University Hugo
Bachmann, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Structural
Dynamics, Swiss Federal Technology Institute
Richard
W. Behan, PhD - Dean Emeritus of the School of
Forestry, Northern Arizona University Derrill
Bodley - Professor of Music, University of the
Pacific Robert
S. Boyer, PhD - Professor of Computer Science,
University of Texas, Austin Francis
Boyle, PhD, LLD - Professor of International Law,
University of Illinois Clare
Brandabur, PhD - Assistant Professor, English
Literature, Dogus University Lt.
Col. Stephen Butler, EdD - Vice Chancellor, Defense
Language Institute Norma
Carr-Rufino, PhD - Professor of Management, San
Francisco State University Angana
Chatterji, PhD - Associate Professor of Anthropology,
California Institute of Integral Studies
Michel
Chossudovsky, PhD - Professor of Economics, University
of Ottawa John
B. Cobb, Jr., PhD - Professor Emeritus of Theology,
Claremont School of Theology Mark
Conrad, JD - Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice,
Troy University William
A. Cook, PhD - Professor of English, University of La
Verne John
N. Cooper, PhD - Professor of Chemistry, Bucknell
University Walter
E. Davis, PhD - Associate Professor, College of
Education, Kent State University Benjamin
Demott, PhD - Professor of Humanities Emeritus,
Amherst College A.
K. Dewdney, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Computer
Science, University of Western Ontario
John
Albert Dragstedt, PhD - Professor of Classics and
Philosophy, St. Mary's College of California
Horst
Ehmke, PhD - Professor of Law, University of
Freiburg C.
Peter Erlinder, JD - Professor of Law, William
Mitchell College of Law Richard
Falk, JSD - Professor Emeritus, International Law and
Practice, Princeton University James
Fetzer, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Philosophy,
University of Minnesota Marcus
Ford, PhD - Professor, Humanities Department, Northern
Arizona University David
Gabbard, EdD - Professor, College of Education, East
Carolina University Daniele
Ganser, PhD - Professor in the History Department,
University of Basel Helen
L. Goggin, EdD - Professor Emerita, Religious
Education, Knox College, University of
Toronto Melvin
A. Goodman, PhD - Professor of International Security,
National War College James
Goulding, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Religion,
MacMurray College David
Ray Griffin, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Philosophy
& Theology, Claremont School of Theology
David
L. Griscom, PhD - Adjunct Professor, Materials Science
and Engineering, University of Arizona
Niels
Harrit, PhD - Associate Professor of Chemistry,
University of Copenhagen Mike
Hawryluk, BA, MAT - Professor Emeritus of
Physics, Suffolk County Community College, NY
Bruce
R. Henry, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Mathematics,
Worcester State College Carter
Heyward, PhD - Professor Emerita of Theology,
Episcopal Divinity School Joel
S. Hirschhorn, PhD - Professor, Metallurgical
Engineering, University of Wisconsin Robert
G. Horn, MD - Clinical Professor, Vanderbilt
University School of Medicine Richard
A. Horsley, PhD - Chair, Dept. of the Study of
Religion, University of Massachusetts Joseph
C. Hough, PhD - President of the Faculty, Union
Theological Seminary, Columbia University
Charles
H. Hux, MD - Associate Professor, Robert Wood Johnson
Medical School Don
Trent Jacobs, EdD, PhD - Professor of Educational
Leadership, Fielding Graduate University
Steven
Jones, PhD - Professor of Physics, Brigham Young
University Eric
Karlstrom, PhD - Professor of Geography, California
State University, Stanislaus Faiz
Khan, MD - Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine,
Long Island Jewish Hospital Michael
Keefer, PhD - Professor, College of Arts, University
of Guelph Jack
Keller, PhD PE - Professor Emeritus, Civil and
Environmental Engineering, Utah State
University Sean
Kelly, PhD - Professor of Philosophy and Religion,
California Institute of Integral Studies
Robert
M. Korol, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Civil Engineering,
McMaster University Georg
Kreis, PhD - Professor of History, University of
Basel Clark
A. Kucheman, PhD - Professor of Christian Ethics,
Claremont McKenna College Kenneth
L. Kuttler, PhD - Professor of Mathematics, Brigham
Young University Eric
Larsen, PhD - Professor of English, John Jay College
of Criminal Justice (CUNY) Stephen
F. LeRoy, PhD - Professor of Economics, University of
California, Santa Barbara Jeffery
D. Long, PhD - Associate Professor of Religion and
Asian Studies, Elizabethtown College Catherine
Lowther, PhD - Professor of Psychology, Goddard
College David
MacGregor, PhD - Professor of Sociology, University of
Western Ontario Graeme
MacQueen, PhD - Associate Professor of Religious
Studies, McMaster University (ret.) John
D. Maguire, PhD - President Emeritus of the Claremont
University Consortium Lynn
Margulis, PhD - Distinguished University Professor,
Dept. of Geosciences, Univ. Massachusetts
Richard
McGinn, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Linguistics and
Southeast Asian Studies, Ohio University
John
McMurtry, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Philosophy,
University of Guelph Robert
Merrill, PhD - Professor of Literature and Humanities,
Maryland Institute College of Art Ralph
Metzner, PhD - Professor of Philosophy, California
Institute of Integral Studies John
Milbank, PhD - Professor in Religion, Politics, and
Ethics, University of Nottingham Mark
Crispin Miller, PhD - Professor, Culture and
Communication, New York University Terry
Morrone, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Physics, Adelphi
University Raymond
Munro, MAH - Professor of Theatre, Clark
University Maj.
John M. Newman, PhD - Professor of History and
International Relations, University of
Maryland Jesus
Nieto, PhD - Associate Professor, College of
Education, San Diego State University Daniel
Orr, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Department of
Economics, University of Illinois John
Pepper, PhD - Assistant Professor, Ecology and
Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona
James
Petras, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Sociology,
Binghamton University, SUNY, New York Peter
Phillips, PhD - Professor of Sociology, Sonoma State
University Rev.
David P. Polk, PhD - Assoc. Professor of Pastoral
Ministry, Texas Christian University James
K. Powell II, PhD - Asst. Professor, Languages and
Cultures of Asia, University of Wisconsin
Diana
Ralph, PhD - Associate Professor, School of Social
Work, Carleton University Joanna
Rankin, PhD - Professor of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Vermont Marcus
Raskin, JD - Professor of Policy Studies, George
Washington University John
Rensenbrink, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Department of
Government, Bowdoin College Morgan
Reynolds, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Economics, Texas
A&M University William
Rice, PE - Professor at Vermont Technical
College Marilynn
M. Rosenthal, PhD - Professor Emerita, Sociology,
University of Michigan Rosemary
Radford Ruether, PhD - Professor Emerita, Feminist
Theology, Grad. Theological Union Bryan
Sacks - Adjunct Professor, Department of English and
Philosophy, Drexel University Robert
Scheer - Professor, Annenberg School for
Communication, University of Southern
California Jörg
Schneider, Dr hc - Professor Emeritus, Structural
Dynamics, Swiss Federal Technology Institute
Peter
Dale Scott, PhD - Professor Emeritus of English,
University of California, Berkeley Charles
Simpson, PhD - Professor of Sociology, State
University of New York, Plattsburgh Rev.
Gerald H. Slusser, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Eden
Theological Seminary James
G. Smart, PhD - Professor Emeritus of History, Keene
State College David
Sprintzen, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Philosophy,
Long Island University Robert
J. Stern, MS - Associate Professor, Mathematics,
Pellissippi State Technical CC Douglas
Sturm, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Religion and
Political Science, Bucknell University
Marjorie
Hewitt Suchocki, PhD - Professor Emerita of Theology,
Claremont School of Theology Martin
Walter, PhD - Professor and Chairman, Department of
Mathematics, University of Colorado Kerry
S. Walters, PhD - Professor and Chair, Philosophy
Department, Gettysburg College William
G. Weaver, JD, PhD - Associate Professor, Political
Science, University of Texas, El Paso Burns
H. Weston, JSD - Professor Emeritus of Law, University
of Iowa William
Willers, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Biology and
Microbiology, University of Wisconsin William
Woodward, PhD - Professor of Psychology, University of
New Hampshire Paul
Zarembka, PhD - Professor of Economics, State
University of New York, Buffalo Howard
Zinn, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Political Science,
Boston University

Many
respected and distinguished university professors have
expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission
Report. A number even allege government complicity in
the terrorist acts of 9/11. Below are the highly
revealing public statements on this vital topic of over
100 university professors with links for verification
and further investigation.

The
collective voices of these respected professors along
with over 50 senior government officials,
over 250 pilots and aviation
professionals, and over
1,000 architects and engineers give credibility to
the claim that the 9/11 Commission Report is tragically
flawed.These dedicated individuals from across the
political spectrum cannot be simply dismissed as
irresponsible believers in some 9/11 conspiracy theory.
Their sincere concern, backed by impeccable credentials,
demonstrates that criticism of the 9/11 Commission
Report is not only reasonable, it is in fact a patriotic
duty.

OVER 100 PROFESSORS
QUESTION 9/11 REPORT

David Ray Griffin, PhD

David Ray
Griffin, PhD – Professor Emeritus, Philosophy
of Religion and Theology, Claremont School of Theology.
Author/editor of over two
dozen books, Prof. Griffin first questioned the 9/11
official story in 2003 while exploring a 9/11
timeline filled with reliable, verifiable facts
suggesting a major cover-up. He then switched his focus
from theology to 9/11 research. His seminal book
on unresolved inconsistencies in the 9/11 official
story, The
New Pearl Harbor, has sold over 100,000
copies. His recent Debunking
9/11 Debunking gives in-depth analysis showing
that most critics of the 9/11 truth movement are
avoiding the deep questions on key, easily verifiable
facts.

Essay: "The 9/11 Commission
Report tells many lies. This point is implied by
my critique's subtitle, 'Omissions
and Distortions.' How many lies are contained in
The 9/11 Commission Report? I do not know.
But, deciding to see how many lies I had discussed in
my book, I found that I had identified over 100 of
them. Once I had made the list, it occurred to me that
others might find this summary helpful. Hence this
article." [List of 115 lies follows.] See full essay
at http://www.serendipity.li/wot/571-page-lie.htm

Video of Speech 9/14/06: "The
official story is false. Why is the official theory an
outrageous conspiracy theory? Because every one of the
major elements in it can easily be shown to be
false."
View video free at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6280545693286773394

Member: Prof. Griffin is an
esteemed member of two
major organizations of scholars dedicated to
researching and revealing the truth of what happened
on the fateful day of 9/11, and of the intrepid WantToKnow.info
team of dedicated researchers.

Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Ray_Griffin

CV: http://www.ctr4process.org/about/CoDirectors/drg_cv.pdf

Joel Hirschhorn, PhD

Joel S.
Hirschhorn, MS (Metallurgical Engineering), PhD
(Materials Engineering) – Professor of
Metallurgical Engineering, University of Wisconsin,
Madison 1965 - 1978. Senior Staff Member, Congressional
Office of Technology Assessment 1978 - 1990. Testified
over 50 times before Congress on technology, science,
and environmental issues. Author of seven books and over
150 papers, articles, and book chapters on environmental
science and technology.

Essay, "Painful
9/11 Truth, " 9/4/07: "Many technical
analyses cast doubt on the official explanation of the
collapse of three World Trade Center buildings,
including those presented by an impressive new group:
Architects and
Engineers for 9/11 Truth. More difficult than
discovering the truth, however, is convincing most of
the public to accept [it].

When it comes to
9/11, we face the strong belief that only al-Qaeda
caused 9/11. But analyses by many experts reveal the
collapse of the three WTC buildings was not caused by
the two airplanes exploding into the twin towers. The
general view is that the buildings were brought down
by controlled demolition.

It would have
taken considerable effort by a number of people with
expertise and access to the buildings to rig them so
that they could be intentionally collapsed when the
two jets hit. Tough questions flood in: Who could have
engineered all this? Could foreign agents accomplish
such complex actions - and if they did, why not take
credit? If Americans did it, why would they
intentionally inflict inevitable mass death and
devastation? Worse, they seemingly knew about the plan
to fly the jets into the towers. Post-9/11, why have
the government and official investigations not come to
the same controlled demolition conclusion? This makes
sense if the government was involved.

Blog: http://dailyscare.com/blog/joel_hirschhorn

A. K. Dewdney, PhD

A. K. Dewdney, PhD –
Professor Emeritus, Department of Computer Science,
University of Western Ontario. Author of Scientific
American's "Computer Recreations" and "Mathematical
Recreations" section, 1984 - 1993. Author of over 80
scientific papers on mathematics, computer science,
engineering, astronomy and biology. Author of numerous
books, including: Beyond
Reason: Eight Great Problems That Reveal the Limits of
Science (2004), A
Mathematical Mystery Tour: Discovering the Truth and
Beauty of the Cosmos (2001), Yes,
We Have No Neutrons: (1997), 200%
of Nothing: An Eye Opening Tour Through the Twists and
Turns of Math Abuse and Innumeracy (1996), The
New Turing Omnibus: Sixty-Six Excursions in Computer
Science (1993).

Essay : "The debris found outside
the Pentagon is inconsistent with the impact of a
Boeing 757 or any aircraft of comparable dimensions.
In particular, in the absence of some agency (possibly
unknown to physical science) that removed the wings,
there is no way to avoid the conclusion that the wings
(and therefore the aircraft) were never present in the
first place. In this case, no Boeing 757 struck the
Pentagon building on the morning of September 11,
2001." http://www.physics911.net/missingwings.htm

Member: Scientific Panel
Investigating 9/11. Panel Statement: "We have
found solid scientific grounds on which to question
the interpretation put upon the events of 9/11 by the
Office of the President of the United States of
America and subsequently propagated by the major
media."

Member: Scholars for 9/11
Truth

Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A._K._Dewdney

CV: http://www.csd.uwo.ca/faculty/akd/PERSONAL/hp.html

Richard Falk, JSD

Richard Falk, JSD – Professor
Emeritus, International Law, Professor of Politics and
International Affairs, Princeton University. In 2001 he
served on the three-person UN Commission on Human Rights
for the Palestine Territories, and previously, on the
Independent International Commission on Kosovo. He is
the author or coauthor of numerous
books, including Religion
and Humane Global Governance; Human
Rights Horizons; On
Humane Governance: Toward a New Global Politics;
and Human
Rights and State Sovereignty. Honorary Vice
president of the American Society of International Law.

Foreward to The
New Pearl Harbor: "The New Pearl
Harbor ... explores the most sensitive and
controversial terrain—the broad landscape of official
behavior in relation to the 9/11 disaster—in the best
spirit of academic detachment coupled with ... a
willingness to allow inquiry to follow the path of
evidence and reason wherever it leads. [It shows that]
there are so many gaping holes in the official
accounts of 9/11 that no plausible coherent narrative
remains.

"[Author David
Ray] Griffin
shows, with insight and a firm grasp of the many
dimensions of global security policy of the Bush
Administration, that getting 9/11 right, even
belatedly, matters desperately. The layer upon layer
of unexplained facts, the multiple efforts by those in
power to foreclose
independent inquiry, and the evidence of a pre-9/11
blueprint by Bush insiders to do what they are
doing on the basis of a 9/11 mandate is why the
Griffin assessment does not even require a reader with
a normally open mind. 30% receptivity will do, which
means that all but the most dogmatically blinded
adherents of the Bush presidency will be convinced by
the basic argument of The New Pearl Harbor."
http://www.transnational.org/SAJT/forum/meet/2004/Falk_GriffinForeword.html

Bio: http://www.ihc.ucsb.edu/events/event_files/past/_winter03/falk

Robert Korol, PhD

Robert M. Korol, PhD –
Professor Emeritus, Department of Civil Engineering,
McMaster University. Elected Fellow of the Engineering
Institute of Canada for exceptional contributions to
engineering in Canada. Fellow of the Canadian Society
for Civil Engineering. Well known for research on steel
structures; the plastic theory of metal structures,
inelastic buckling, limit analysis, environmental
assessment and life cycle analysis methodologies.
Hamilton-Wentworth's 1998 "Engineer of the Year."

Video of Hamilton, Ontario, 9/11 Truth
Symposium 3/23/07 Clip 2 Duration 28:47: (See
http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?cat=9998&med=0&ord=Name&strt=10&vid=206&epi=0&typ=0)

[At 12:40,
regarding collapse of WTC Towers 1 & 2] "The whole
idea of the pancake theory ... that NIST talks about
means that you have no resistance on the way down at
that particular floor level that was supposedly
weakened significantly. And by significantly I mean
all around the perimeter, all at the same time. What
an amazing thing that all of the bolts would have
failed at the same time. All of the welds would have
failed at the same time. And the whole thing comes
down very nicely.

There isn't even
an explanation for how the core of the structure
[collapsed]. It contained the elevators and the
stairwells. It is an extremely highly structurally
resisting part of the structure. So it is a very
strong part of the structure. And it ... was virtually
ignored [in the NIST report]. They just talk about the
trusses that go across from column to column. And all
of them fail at the same time. They start coming down.
Even if you were to accept that, you've got resistance
as the floors come down.

[At minute
26:05] I think Building number 7 is the big, big
question mark and I don't know that there is an
engineering explanation for that other than controlled
demolition." http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/hamilton911symposium/hamilton911event2.wmv

Bio: http://www.eng.mcmaster.ca/engalumni/macengineer/1999winter/engineerofyear.htm

Lynn Margulis, PhD

Lynn Margulis, PhD –
Distinguished University Professor in the Department of
Geosciences, University of Massachusetts - Amherst.
Elected to the National Academy of
Sciences in 1983. Former Chair, National Academy of
Science's Space Science Board Committee on Planetary
Biology and Chemical Evolution. Recipient of the
National Medal of Science, America's highest honor for
scientific achievement. Dr. Margulis is best known for
contributions to evolution, especially the theory of
symbiogenesis. She is the author of over 130 scientific
works and numerous books.

Personal statement to website, 8/27/07:
"The 9/11 tragedy is the most successful and
most perverse publicity stunt in the history of public
relations. I arrive at this conclusion largely as the
result of the research and clear writing by David
Ray Griffin in his fabulous books about 9/11. It
is clear to me that David Ray Griffin and his fellow
critics are correct: the 9/11 'new Pearl Harbor' was
planned in astonishing detail and carried out through
the efforts of a sophisticated and large network of
operatives. It was more complex and far more
successful than the Allende assassination, the US
bombing of our own ship, the Maine, that began the
Spanish-American war, the Reichstag
fire that was used to justify the suspension of
most civil liberties in Germany in the 1930's, and
even Operation
Himmler, which was used by Germany to justify the
invasion of Poland, which started World War II.

"I suggest that
those of us aware and concerned demand that the
glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be
dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and
impartial investigation be undertaken."

Bio: http://www.chelseagreen.com/authors/LynnMargulis

David L. Griscom, PhD

David L. Griscom, PhD –
Research physicist, retired from Naval Research
Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, DC, after 33 years
service. Visiting professorships at the Universities of
Paris and Saint-Etienne, France, and Tokyo Institute of
Technology. Adjunct Professor of Materials Science and
Engineering, University of Arizona (2004 - 2005). Fellow
of the American Physical Society. Principal author of
109 of his 185 published works. Frequently cited by
other researchers.

Personal blog 2/9/07:
"David
Ray Griffin has web-published a splendid, highly
footnoted account of The
Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the
Official Account Cannot Be True. This
scholarly work, rich in eyewitness accounts, includes
11 separate pieces of evidence that the World Trade
Center towers 1, 2, and
7 were brought down by explosives.

I implore my
fellow physicists and engineers who may have time,
expertise, and (ideally) supercomputer access to get
to work on the physics of the WTC collapses and
publish their findings in refereed journals like the
Journal of Applied Physics.

The issue of
knowing who was really behind the 9/11 attacks is of
paramount importance to the future of our country,
because the "official" assumption that it was the work
of 19 Arab amateurs (1) does not match the available
facts and (2) has led directly to the deplorable
Patriot Act, the illegal Iraq war, NSA spying on
ordinary Americans, [and] repudiation of the Geneva
Conventions.

Surely these
Orwellian consequences of public ignorance constitute
more than sufficient motivation for any patriotic
American physicist or engineer to join the search for
9/11 Truth!" http://impactglassman.blogspot.com/

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice

Bio: http://www.impactglassresearchinternational.com/index.html

Howard Zinn, PhD

Howard Zinn, PhD – Professor
Emeritus of Political Science, Boston University.
Historian, social activist, author. Former U.S. Army Air
Corps bombardier in World War II. Author of numerous
books, including the highly popular A
People's History of the United States (1980,
2005). Other books are Howard
Zinn on Democratic Education (2004), Terrorism
and War (2002), and The
Zinn Reader (1997).

Endorsement of The
New Pearl Harbor: "David
Ray Griffin has done admirable and painstaking
research in reviewing the mysteries surrounding the
9-11 attacks. It is the most persuasive argument I
have seen for further investigation of the Bush
administration's relationship to that historic and
troubling event."

Endorsement of Debunking
9/11 Debunking: "Considering how the
9/11 tragedy has been used by the Bush administration
to propel us into immoral wars again and again, I
believe that David
Ray Griffin's provocative questions about 9/11
deserve to be investigated and addressed."

Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers
to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for
four things:

Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot
Spitzer

Immediate investigation in Congressional
hearings.

Media attention to scrutinize and investigate
the evidence.

The formation of a truly independent
citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Bio: http://www.heartbone.com/supcourt/howard.htm

Steven Jones, PhD

Steven Jones, PhD – Former
Professor of Physics at Brigham Young University.
Retired Oct. 2006 to devote more time to 9/11 research.
Principal Investigator for experimental Muon-catalyzed
fusion for the U.S. Department of Energy. Author of over
40 papers published in peer-reviewed scientific
journals. Founder of Journal
of 9/11 Studies for scholarly papers
questioning the 9/11 official story.

Peer reviewed paper, Why Indeed Did
the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse? in Journal of
9/11 Studies, 9/06: "On the basis of
photographic and video evidence as well as related
data and analyses, I provide thirteen reasons for
rejecting the official hypothesis, according to which
fire and impact damage caused the collapse of the Twin
Towers and WTC
7, in favor of the controlled-demolition
hypothesis. The goal of this paper is to promote
further scrutiny of the official government-sponsored
reports as well as serious investigation of the
controlled demolition hypothesis." http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/Why_Indeed_Did_the_WTC_Buildings_Completely_Collapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf

[Editor's note:
WTC Building 7 was 47 stories tall and was
not hit by an airplane. However, no mention of the
reason for its collapse appears in the 9/11
Commission's "full and complete account of the
circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001
terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here.]

Founding Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization
consisting of independent researchers and activists
engaged in uncovering the true nature of the September
11, 2001 attacks."

Major media coverage: http://www.wanttoknow.info/stevenjonesnewsarticles

Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_E._Jones

John B. Cobb, Jr., PhD

John B. Cobb, Jr., PhD –
Professor Emeritus of Theology and Co-Director of the
Center for Process Studies at the Claremont School of
Theology. Prof. Cobb was a Fullbright professor at the
University of Mainz, and visiting professor at
Vanderbilt, Harvard, and Chicago Divinity Schools.
Author, co-author, and editor of numerous books on
religion, his writings include; Biblical
Preaching on the Death of Jesus (1989), For
the Common Good co-authored with Herman Daly
and winner of the Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving
World Order (1991), Sustaining
the Common Good : A Christian Perspective on the Global
Economy (1994), Christ
in a Pluralistic Age (1999), God
and the World (2001), The
Call of the Spirit: Process Spirituality in a Relational
World (2005).

Co-editor of 9/11 book: Joining
the many educated elite raising serious questions
about involvement of rogue elements of government in
9/11, Prof. Cobb co-edited a landmark book from a
religious perspective on this vital topic, 911
and American Empire (Vol II) – Christians, Jews and
Muslims Speak Out (2006).

Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers
to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for
four things:

Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot
Spitzer

Immediate investigation in Congressional
hearings.

Media attention to scrutinize and investigate
the evidence.

The formation of a truly independent
citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_B._Cobb%2C_Jr.

CV: http://www.ctr4process.org/about/CoDirectors/cobb_cv.pdf

John N. Cooper, PhD

John N. Cooper, PhD
– Professor of Chemistry, Bucknell University
1967 - 2003. Author of 35 published papers in the fields
of chemical education and inorganic kinetics and
structure.

Review of Prof. David
Ray Griffin's The
New Pearl Harbor 3/29/04: "Griffin's
approach is utterly admirable: coherently,
systematically and objectively, he scrupulously and
minutely documents the flaws, contradictions,
inconsistencies and discrepancies in the 'official
version' of the events of that day. Ultimately he
assembles and tabulates a list of thirty-eight
apparent irregularities in the timeline of, and
evidence remaining from, these attacks and asks how
they might plausibly be reconciled: Why were the
'standard operating procedures' for the emergency
scrambling of fighter jets in the event of a
commercial airplane's highjacking not implemented
until after the crash at the Pentagon? Why was there
no evidence of a passenger jet debris at the Pentagon
crash site? What happened on UA flight 93?

Griffin refuses
to throw out possibilities simply because they are
outrageous, outlandish or shocking; he lets the
evidence speak for itself. The results are deeply
disturbing. With admirable academic objectivity,
Griffin refuses to indict or endorse any specific
hypothesis. Rather he presents a substantial body of
very disturbing evidence. [He then] calls for a real,
open, hardnosed investigation that does not begin with
the proposition that only those scenarios in which the
assumption that our government or its members play
only a benign and benevolent role - seeking only the
welfare and best interests of its citizenry - will be
considered.

The New
Pearl Harbor - Disturbing Questions About the Bush
Administration and 9/11 is a book that ought to
be thoughtfully read and considered by every thinking,
voting member of the electorate." http://www.axisoflogic.com/cgi-bin/exec/view.pl?archive=47&num=6002

Bio: http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/jcooper/

Rosemary Radford Ruether, PhD

Rosemary Radford Ruether, PhD
– Professor Emerita, Pacific School of Religion
and Graduate Theological Union. Author and editor of
numerous books including; Four
Centuries of American Women's Religious Writing
(1996), Women
and Redemption: A Theological History (1998),
Christianity
and Ecology (2000), Christianity
and the Making of the Modern Family (2001),
The
Wrath of Jonah (2002), Interpreting
the Postmodern: Responses to "Radical
Orthodoxy" (2006), Encyclopedia
of Women And Religion in North America (2006).

Essay: "Until recently I
dismissed the suggestions that the Bush administration
might have been complicit in allowing 9/11 to happen
as groundless "conspiracy theory." Thus it was with
some skepticism that I agreed to read the new
book written by David
Ray Griffin ... that argues the case for just such
complicity.

"Griffin writes in a precise and
careful fashion, avoiding inflammatory rhetoric. He
argues for a high probability for the Bush's
administrations complicity with allowing and
facilitating the attacks, based not on any one
conclusive piece of evidence, but the sheer
accumulation of all of the data. He concludes by
calling for a genuinely independent investigative
effort that would examine all this evidence.

"I personally
found Griffin's book both convincing and chilling. If
the complicity of the Bush Administration to which he
points is true, then Americans have a far greater
problem on their hands than even the more ardent
anti-war critics have imagined. If the administration
... would do this, what else would they do to maintain
and expand their power?" http://www.thewitness.org/agw/ruether010804.html

Bio:http://www.cgu.edu/pages/3563.asp

Niels Harrit, PhD

Niels Harrit, PhD
– Associate Professor of Chemistry, University
of Copenhagen. Member, International Union of Pure and
Applied Chemistry. Member, European Photochemistry
Association. Author of numerous scientific papers with a
special focus on nano-science.

Essay 3/31/07: "Two official
explanations of the events in Manhattan on 11
September have been put forward by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the National
Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST).

In the final
FEMA report, WTC7 is hardly mentioned. They note that
there were fires in the building, but do not attempt
to explain the collapse. The final NIST report was
released in September 2005, but the section covering
WTC7 was left out, with the promise that a final
version would be released later. Publication has been
delayed several times, and we are still waiting for
it.

The
attack on the World Trade Center was a tragedy for the
people in the towers and in the airplanes, and a
tragedy for their families. It also marked the
beginning of the tragic war on terror. The current
trends in Western society towards greater surveillance
and the loss of civil rights can also only be called
tragic. If we have also been lied to, the tragedy is
complete.

How did WTC7
collapse? We are not asking 'why'. Some extremely
simple observations have been made, and we want to
hear an official explanation that is consistent with
elementary physics and chemistry." http://www.911truth.dk/first/en/art_Harrit.htm

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice

Peter Phillips, PhD

Peter Phillips, PhD –
Professor of Sociology, Sonoma State University.
Director, Project
Censored. Author of several
books and chief editor of the highly regarded annual
Project Censored books which uncover vital news
neglected by the major media. Prof. Phillips is also a
respected member of the intrepid WantToKnow.info
team.

Essay 3/6/05: "A threshold
concept facing Americans is the possibility that the
9/11 Commission Report was on many levels a cover-up
for the failure of the US government to prevent the
tragedy. The report failed to address sources of
external assistance to the terrorists. Investigations
into this area might have lead to a conclusion that
elements of various governments - including our own -
not only knew about the attacks in advance, but also
may have helped facilitate their implementation.

"Overall
concerns with the official version of 9/11 have been
published and discussed by scholars
and politicians around the world. The response to
most has been to label these discussions as
"conspiracy theories" unworthy of media coverage or
further review. Pursuit of a critical analysis of
these questions is undermined by the psychological
barrier about 9/11 issues as threshold concepts — too
awful to even consider.

"We must step
past the threshold and have the courage to ask the
questions, demand answers, and support research into
all aspects of this American tragedy. Perhaps the
closet isn't as dark and as fearful as we envision. If
we don't courageously look and search into the deepest
regions of our fears, how can we assure our children
and ourselves a safe and honest future?" http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0306-23.htm

Bio: http://www.sonoma.edu/sociology/biopeter.htm

Hugo Bachmann, PhD

Hugo Bachmann, PhD –
Professor Emeritus, former Chairman of the Department of
Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Swiss
Federal Institute of Technology. Author/co-author, Erdbebenbemessung
von Stahlbetonhochbauten (Seismic Analysis of
Concrete Reinforced Structures - 1990), Vibration
Problems in Structures: Practical Guidelines
(1995), Biege-
und Schubversuche an teilweise vorgespannten
Leichtbetonbalken (Structural Analysis of Linked
Concrete Beams - 1998), Hochbau
für Ingenieure. Eine Einführung (Structural
Construction for Engineers - 2001), Erdbebensicherung
von Bauwerken (Earthquake-proofing Buildings -
2002).

Tages Anzeiger Article
9/9/06: "In my opinion the building WTC
7 was, with great probability, professionally
demolished," says Hugo Bachmann, Emeritus ETH [Swiss
Federal Institute of Technology], Professor of
Structural Analysis and Construction."

English translation:
http://www.danieleganser.ch/zeitungsartikel...
Original
in German: http://www.danieleganser.ch/zeitungsartikel/pdf/GanserDererbitterteStreitumden11.SeptemberTagesAnzeiger9.Sept2006.pdf

Book 9/11
Synthetic Terror: Made in USA: "As
Bachmann told the Neue Züricher Zeitung Online on
September 13, 2001, at first glance there seemed to be
two possibilities in the fall of the towers. The first
was the fire and its effect on the steel supports. But
Bachmann had an alternative: "In the second scenario,
an additional terrorist action would have caused the
collapse of the buildings. In this way, according to
Bachmann, buildings like the World Trade center can be
destroyed without great logistical exertion." The
article went on to say that "Bachmann could imagine
that the perpetrators had installed explosives on key
supports in a lower floor before the attack." If the
perpetrators had rented office space, then these
"explosive tenants" could have calmly placed explosive
charges on the vulnerable parts of the building
"without having anyone notice."
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/collapseofWTCeyewitnessreportsexplosions07feb05.shtml

Bio: http://www.ibk.ethz.ch/emeritus/Bachmann/about/index_EN

Jörg Schneider, Dr hc

Jörg Schneider, Dr hc –
Professor Emeritus, Structural Dynamics and Earthquake
Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.
Former Vice President and honorary lifetime member of
the International Association for Bridge and Structural
Engineering.

Tages Anzeiger Article
9/9/06: "In my opinion ... building WTC
7 was, with great probability, professionally
demolished," says Hugo Bachmann, Emeritus
ETH-Professor of Structural Analysis and Construction.
And also Jörg Schneider, likewise emeritus
ETH-Professor of Structural Analysis and Construction,
interprets the few available video recordings as
evidence that "the building WTC 7 was with great
probability demolished."
English
translation:
http://www.danieleganser.ch/zeitungsartikel...
Original
in German: http://www.danieleganser.ch/zeitungsartikel/pdf/GanserDererbitterteStreitumden11.SeptemberTagesAnzeiger9.Sept2006.pdf

[Editor's note:
WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories,
and was not hit by an airplane. However, no mention of
its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full
and complete account of the circumstances surrounding
the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the
collapse video here.]

Bio: http://www.iabse.ethz.ch/association/awards/honorarypres/schneider.php

Daniele Ganser, PhD

Daniele Ganser,
PhD –
Professor in the History Department at the
University of Basel. Former Senior Researcher at the
Center for Security Studies at the Swiss Federal
Institute of Technology. Former Researcher at the
Military Academy (MILAK) of the Swiss Federal Institute
of Technology. Author of NATO's
Secret Armies, on the history of U.S.-sponsored
false flag operations in Europe after WW II.

Interview 4/8/05: "Academics who
study secret warfare find themselves between these
three theories—LIHOP [The US government knew the
attack was coming, but Let It Happen On Purpose],
SURPRISE [The US government was not expecting the
attack], and INSIDE JOB [The U.S. government planned
and executed the attack]. They all are "conspiracy
theories," by the way. Researchers try to find out
which theory is best able to account for all the known
facts.

"But
unfortunately, the 600-page [9/11 Commission] report,
published in July 2004 and accepted by Bush as the
"official story" of what happened in respect to 9/11,
does not even mention the LIHOP and INSIDE JOB
theories! It presents SURPRISE as the only possible
explanation.

"Now, [9/11
Commission Executive Director] Philip Zelikow is a
respected professor of history. As a fellow historian
I was therefore very surprised to find that his report
is totally unbalanced. Of course, Zelikow is aware of
the LIHOP and INSIDE JOB theories, no doubt. How can
he author a book on 9/11, which claims to search for
the truth, but which totally ignores these theories?"
http://www.danieleganser.ch/e/interviews/pdf_05/EIR_Interview_Gladio_and_911_08.04.05.pdf

Bio: http://www.danieleganser.ch/e/biographie/index.htm

John McMurtry, PhD

John McMurtry, PhD –
Professor of Philosophy, University of Guelph. Fellow of
the Royal Society of Canada. Author of several books
dealing with public policy issues, including: Value
Wars: The Global Market Versus the Life Economy, and
Unequal
Freedoms: The Global Market As an Ethical System.

Contributor to 9/11
and American Empire (Vol I): Intellectuals Speak
Out: "The documented details that
expose 9/11 denial will not be repeated here, because
this volume and others have already reported them.
They are impressively massive in confirming ... the
long open pathway to the attacks and the blocking of
all independent inquiry since then." http://www.snowshoefilms.com/mcmurtryunderstanding911.html

Signatory: Petition For An
Independent International 9/11 Truth Commission. "The
Bush administration has never offered a detailed and
documented account of its claims about the events of
9-11 which have allegedly revolutionized human
affairs. Nor has it explained obvious and serious
discrepancies in its own statements and actions. The
Kean-Hamilton panel's limited funding from Congress
makes a mockery of the tragedy of 9-11, considering
that it is only a small fraction of the huge sums
spent to investigate Bill Clinton [for his sexual
indiscretions].

"We therefore
call upon statesmen, thinkers, journalists,
investigators, artists, scientists, and other eminent
personalities from around the world to form an
Independent International Truth Commission dedicated
to preventing unproven assertions about 9-11 from
setting the stage for a new world conflagration." http://iitc.911review.org/

Bio: http://www.uoguelph.ca/philosophy/faculty/jmcmurtry.shtml

Peter Dale Scott, PhD

Peter Dale Scott, PhD –
Professor Emeritus of English at University of
California, Berkeley. Former Canadian diplomat who
served at the UN and the Canadian Embassy in Poland.
Author of Drugs,
Oil and War (2003), and several other books
including Deep
Politics and the Death of JFK (1996) and The
Iran-Contra Connection. Co-editor of 9/11
and American Empire (Vol I) – Intellectuals Speak
Out (2006). His writings deal, among other
matters, with U.S. covert operations and their impact on
democracy at home and abroad. Prof. Scott is also a
respected member of the intrepid WantToKnow.info
team.

Congressional briefing testimony
7/22/05: "The American people have been
seriously misled about the origins of the al Qaeda
movement ... just as they have been seriously misled
about the reasons for America's invasion of Iraq. The
9/11 Commission Report assures Americans that 'Bin
Ladin and his comrades had their own sources of
support and training, and they received little or no
assistance from the United States.' This misleading
statement fails to consider that:

– Al Qaeda
elements received considerable indirect U.S.
Government assistance, first in Afghanistan until
1992, and thereafter in other countries such as
Azerbaijan (1992-95)

– Key members of
the network which became al Qaeda, such as Sheikh Omar
Abdel Rahman, Ali Mohamed, Mohamed Jamal Khalifa, and
lead hijacker Mohammed Atta, were granted
visas to enter the United States, despite being
suspected of terrorism.

– Repeatedly al
Qaeda terrorists were protected by FBI officials from
investigation and prosecution." [Editor's
note: See also Coleen
Rowley and Bryan
Sacks.] http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~pdscott/911Background.htm

Bio: http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~pdscott/

Terry Morrone, PhD
No photo available

Terry Morrone, PhD –
Professor Emeritus of Physics, Adelphi University.
Author of several scientific papers on the physics of
plasma. Researcher and innovator in Nuclear Magnetic
Resonance Imaging (MRI) and holder of 17
patents in the field.

Essay in April 2007 Edition of Journal of
9/11 Studies Titled Proof That The
Thermal and Gravitational Energy Available Were
Insufficient To Melt Steel In The Twin Towers And 7
World Trade Center On 9/11
"In this
communication I shall show that only explosives could
have produced the large amounts of molten steel found
at the site of the World Trade Center (WTC) in the
days following 9/11. There is universal agreement by
scientists in and out of government that the
temperatures reached in the fires were much lower than
the melting point of steel. Steel could have only have
melted (assuming no explosives were used) if it gained
additional energy in falling. I shall show that this
gravitational energy is insufficient to cause
melting.

Conclusions:
Since there was molten steel in the wreckage of the
World Trade Center, and since the temperatures of the
fires were insufficient to melt steel, and since the
gravitational energy was shown to be very much smaller
than the energy needed to melt steel, the Twin Towers
and 7 WTC could only have been brought down by
explosives or cutter charges." http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/ProfMorroneOnMeltingWTCsteel.pdf

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization
consisting of independent researchers and activists
engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11
attacks."

Mike Hawryluk,
MAT
No photo available

Mike Hawryluk, MAT –
Professor Emeritus of Physics and former Division
Chairman, Suffolk County Community College, NY.

Statement to this website
3/30/07: "My wife and I,
transfixed in front of a TV as the horror of 9/11
unfolded, watched as the topmost, undamaged floors of
the WTC South Tower started to gradually lean (rotate)
in the direction of the damage due to impact. In an
instant, the rotation stopped, and that which was
rotating began to fall, as if only under the influence
of gravity! The fulcrum was no longer there!

I blurted out,
"My god, they wired the building."

I haven't been
at peace with myself, or the world, since then. I had
no idea who the "they" in my utterance was, and to
this day still do not. Since learning more about the
events leading up, and subsequent to the tragedy, I
have become firmly convinced that the conspiracy being
sold to the world by the Government, the media, and
debunkers is the greatest Red Herring of our time, if
not in history. Those of us who are seeking the "Truth
about 9/11" face a formidable but not insurmountable
challenge: to convince those who don't want to know to
join us in applying a continuing and increasing
pressure on the media to force those who don't want us
to know into the light of day." Link
to full statement

Member:
Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice. Association
Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a
non-partisan organization consisting of independent
researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the
true nature of the 9/11 attacks."

Michel Chossudovsky,
PhD

Michel Chossudovsky, PhD
– Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa.
Consultant to several international organizations
including the United Nations Development Programme
(UNDP), the African Development Bank, the United Nations
African Institute for Economic Development and Planning
(AIEDEP), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA),
the International Labour Organization (ILO), the World
Health Organisation (WHO), the United Nations Economic
Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).
Prof. Chossudovsky is the author of several
important books, including his popular War
and Globalisation: The Truth Behind September
11.

Article 7/20/06: "What I've done
in my writings is to show that the official narrative
or explanation regarding 9/11 can be refuted, namely
that the official narrative is a lie.

"What the 9/11
Commission Report has submitted is an extensive
narrative of what happened on that day and what
happened on the planes. And the evidence suggests that
the 9/11 report is a lie. It's fabricated." http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20060720&articleId=2769

Over 100 Articles and Papers : http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=listByAuthor&authorFirst=Michel&authorName=Chossudovsky

Bio: http://www.transnational.org/SAJT/tff/people/m_chossudovsky.html

Bruce R. Henry, PhD

Bruce R. Henry, PhD –
Professor Emeritus, Mathematics and Computer Science,
Worcester State College. Former guidance systems
engineer for Polaris and Trident missiles, General
Electric.

Statement to this website
6/11/07: "It is clear extraordinarily
powerful explosives were used to destroy the WTC Twin
Towers. Careful scrutiny of video of the collapse of
the South Tower (WTC2) shows the upper segment (above
the airplane strike) listing, then dropping, then
disintegrating or pulverizing. There was a massive
explosion near ground level immediately before those
events. The tilt-then-drop sequence shows the
building's central structural steel core ... had by
some agency been made insubstantial and unable to bear
weight. Putting that together with the ground level
blast and the subsequent pulverization it is clear
very powerful explosives had to have been in play. The
airplane strike was a mere smokescreen.

Who planted the
explosives? What kind of explosives were used? When
were they planted? And for what reasons would someone
destroy ... the Twin Towers? Simple logic requires of
a credible account of the 9/11 events that it explain
ALL details clearly shown in documentary footage,
together with all other known facts. The Official
Story does not even come close to meeting that
standard."

Article 8/12/06: "The sudden
collapse, the seamless downward cascade of the
crumbling WTC towers planted doubt in Bruce Henry's
mind. The way the buildings fell didn't seem right.
The implosion-like plummeting, the absence of central
beams and girders refusing to fall, the speed of the
collapse -- all raised suspicion for the retired
mathematics professor from Worcester. "To me it seems
so transparent with a minimal amount of reflection
that there's something catawampus," or cockeyed, with
the terrorist attacks of 9/11. Finally, he came to a
shocking conclusion that runs counter to the accepted
history of America's darkest day: The towers, he
believes, "were brought down by planted explosives."
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=14428

Member: Scholars for 9/11
Truth

Martin Walter, PhD
No photo
available

Martin Walter, PhD –
Professor and Chairman of the Department of Mathematics,
University of Colorado at Boulder. Member, Executive
Committee of the Rocky Mountain chapter of the Sierra
Club.

Member: Scholars for 9/11
Truth Association Statement: "Research proves
the current administration has been dishonest about
what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The
World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down
by controlled demolitions and that the available
relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the
government's official story about the attack on the
Pentagon."

Bio: http://www.colorado.edu/math/earthmath/marty.html

William Rice, PE
No photo
available

William Rice, PE
– Former Professor of Engineering at Vermont
Technical College where he taught engineering materials,
structures lab, and other building related courses.
Registered Professional Civil Engineer who worked on
structural steel and concrete buildings in Boston, New
York, and Philadelphia.

Essay Vermont Guardian
3/1/07: "Having worked on structural steel
buildings as a civil engineer in the era when the Twin
Towers were designed and constructed, I found some
disturbing discrepancies and omissions concerning
their collapse on 9/11. The interesting fact is that
each of these 110-story Twin Towers fell upon itself
in about ten seconds at nearly free-fall speed. This
violates Newton's Law of Conservation of Momentum that
would require that as the stationary inertia of each
floor is overcome by being hit, the mass (weight)
increases and the free-fall speed decreases.

Even if Newton's
Law is ignored, the prevailing theory would have us
believe that each of the Twin Towers inexplicably
collapsed upon itself crushing all 287 massive columns
on each floor while maintaining a free-fall speed as
if the 100,000, or more, tons of supporting
structural-steel framework underneath didn't exist.

Controlled
demolition is so politically unthinkable that the
media not only demeans the messenger but also
ridicules and "debunks" the message rather than
provide investigative reporting. Curiously, it took
441 days for the president's 9/11 Commission to start
an "investigation" into a tragedy where more than
2,500 WTC lives were taken. The Commission's
investigation also didn't include the possibility of
controlled-demolition, nor did it include an
investigation into the "unusual and unprecedented"
manner in which WTC Building #7 collapsed. http://www.vermontguardian.com/commentary/032007/TwinTowers.shtml

Robert S. Boyer, PhD

Robert S. Boyer, PhD –
Professor of Computer Science, University of Texas,
Austin. Fellow of the American Association for
Artificial Intelligence. Awarded the 2005 Software
System Award by the Association for Computing Machinery.
Awarded the 6th Herbrand Award (1999) for exceptional
contributions to the field of Automated Deduction, by
the Conferences on Automated Deduction. Co-author of A
Computational Logic Handbook. Editor of Automated
Reasoning.

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization
consisting of independent researchers and activists
engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11
attacks."

Bio: http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~boyer/

Joanna Rankin, PhD

Joanna Rankin,
PhD – Professor of Physics and
Astronomy, University of Vermont.

Member: Vermonters
for a Real 9/11 Investigation. Association
Statement: "We do support a new, thorough, and truly
independent forensic investigation of the events on
and surrounding 9/11. We believe that without such an
investigation, the threat of further attacks like
those of 9/11 remains unabated, our government will
continue to erode our civil liberties, and our
government will continue to support foreign policies
that are destructive to the U.S. and to the world."

Bio: http://www.uvm.edu/~jmrankin/?Page=default.html

Kenneth L. Kuttler, PhD

Kenneth L. Kuttler,
PhD – Professor of
Mathematics, Brigham Young University.

Essay: "I provide a short
computation, focused on World
Trade Center building 7. Based on very favorable
assumptions for achieving a fast fall, including
ignoring resistance due to intact steel columns, I
could only get the building to fall in about 8.3
seconds, whereas the observed roof-fall time is
approximately 6.5 seconds. The problem is the large
number of floors and conservation of momentum in a
collision. Some of the "official" explanations about
progressive collapse are evocative but they do not
explain the difficulty in the rapid fall of the
building along with what is evidently taking place
when the video of the falling building is observed."
http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/W7Kuttler.pdf

[Editor's note:
WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories,
and was not hit by an airplane. It would have been the
tallest building in 33 states. However, no mention of
its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's
"full and complete account of the circumstances
surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks." Watch the collapse video here.
And 5 1/2 years after 9/11, the Federal government has
yet to publish its promised final report that explains
the cause of its collapse.]

Bio: https://math.byu.edu/~klkuttle/

CV: http://www.math.byu.edu/~klkuttle/vitaforweb.pdf

Robert J. Stern, MS

Robert J. Stern, MS
– Associate Professor, Mathematics, Pellissippi
State Technical Community College.

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization
consisting of independent researchers and activists
engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11
attacks."

Jack Keller, PhD, PE

Jack Keller, PhD, PE –
Professor Emeritus, Civil and Environmental Engineering,
Utah State University. Selected by Scientific
American magazine as one of the world's 50 leading
contributors to science and technology benefiting
society (2004). Member, National Academy of Engineering.
International advisor on water resources, development
and agricultural water use. Awarded State of Utah
Governor's Medal for Science and Technology (1988).

Member: Scholars for 9/11
Truth. Association Statement: "Research
proves the current administration has been dishonest
about what happened in New York and Washington, D.C.
The World Trade Center was almost certainly brought
down by controlled demolitions and that the available
relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the
government's official story about the attack on the
Pentagon."

Carter Heyward, PhD

Carter Heyward, PhD –
Howard Chandler Robbins Professor Emerita of Theology,
Episcopal Divinity School, Cambridge, Mass. Author of
books A
Priest Forever: One Woman's Controversial Ordination in
the Episcopal Church (1999), When
Boundaries Betray Us (2000), Staying
Power: Reflections on Gender, Justice, and
Compassion (2001), God
in the Balance: Christian Spirituality in Times of
Terror (2002).

Endorsement Christian
Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11: A Call to Reflection
and Action: "Are we brave enough to
read this nerve-wracking book, one of the most
important theological texts of our time? Rooted in the
longstanding belief that Christians share
responsibility for shaping a more justice-loving
world, Griffin
makes a strong case that the real "conspiracy theory"
about 9/11 is the Bush Administration's silly notion
that nineteen young Arab men could have pulled it off.
Griffin helps us wrestle with questions that are
almost too much to bear, yet which may empower us, if
we dare, to build a more truthful and, over time, more
deeply moral nation and world." http://www.miraesoft.com/karel/2006/07/24/christian-faith-and-the-truth-behind-911/

Bio: http://www.eds.edu/sec.asp?cat=78&page=74

Rev. Gerald H.
Slusser, PhD

Rev. Gerald H. Slusser,
PhD - Professor Emeritus, Theology and
Education, Eden Theological Seminary, St. Louis. Past
President, Association of Professors and Researchers in
Religious Education. Author or co-author of From
Jung to Jesus: Myth and Consciousness in the New
Testament (1986), Technology:
The God That Failed: The Environmental
Catastrophe (1971), A
Christian Look at Secular Society (1968), A
Dynamic Approach to Church Education (1968)

Review of The
New Pearl Harbor 4/12/04: "A new
book written by David
Ray Griffin ... raises significant and pungent
questions about the involvement of the Bush
administration in the tragedy now known as 9/11. This
book reads like a fine detective novel. Its author has
done his research very carefully and it is in the
marshalling of the evidence that the suspense is
created. It is difficult to overestimate the
importance of this book in bringing to our attention
facts that challenge any attempt of the administration
to explain away its responsibility, or even
complicity, in the events of 9/11. Whatever you now
think of the Bush administration and its handling of
9/11, this book is must, essential reading because it
presents in careful, scholarly manner facts that have
to be dealt with in any further analysis of the 9/11
tragedy and its aftermath, the war on terrorism. ...

In closing
this review I want to make two comments. First is to
commend Professor Griffin for an independent, careful
and systematic examination of the evidence. Secondly,
the conclusions of this book make it abundantly clear
that we have the greatest problem in our history on
our hands, far greater than the Nixon Watergate
scandal. We seem to be being led like sheep into an
imperialist stance in which America is to rule the
world for the sake of American business and profit."
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/1566565529/ref=cm_rev_next/105-8009672-4038058?tag=wanttinfo-20&ie=UTF8&customer-reviews.sort%5Fby=-HelpfulVotes&n=283155&s=books&customer-reviews.start=21

Horst Ehmke, PhD

Horst Ehmke, PhD – Professor
of Law, University of Freiburg. Former Minister of
Justice (West Germany). Former Minister for Research and
Technology. Cabinet Member under Chancellors Kurt
Kiesinger and Willy Brandt 1966 - 1974. Author of Politik
der praktischen Vernunft: Aufsätze und
Referaten (Pragmatic Politics) (1969), Politik
als Herausforderung (The Challenge of Politics)
(1974), Democratic
Socialism and Eurocommunism: The Policy of Detente and
Ideological Controversy (1977), Das
Portrait, Horst Ehmke: Reden und Beiträge (Self
Portrait of Horst Ehmke: Speeches and Essays) (1980), Beiträge
zur Verfassungstheorie und Verfassungspolitik
(Writings on Constitutional Theory and Politics) (1981),
A
Second Phase of Detente (1987), Mittendrin:
Von der grossen Koalition zur deutschen Einheit
(In the Midst of It: From the Federal Republic to German
Unification) (1994).

Article 7/22/04: "Terrorists
could not have carried out such an operation with four
hijacked planes without the support of a secret
service." http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,,1266511,00.html

Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horst_Ehmke

Burns H. Weston, JSD

Burns H. Weston, JSD –
Bessie Dutton Murray Distinguished Professor of Law
Emeritus and Director, Center for Human Rights,
University of Iowa. Fellow, World Academy of Art and
Science. Honorary Editor, Board of Editors, American
Journal of International Law (Washington, DC).
Senior Human Rights Adviser, IKEA Social Initiative.
Senior Human Rights Adviser, UNICEF Innocenti Research
Centre, Florence, Italy.

Endorsement of The
9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and
Distortions: "In this masterful
sequel to The
New Pearl Harbor, David
Ray Griffin unveils a disparity between official
9/11 "spin" and independently researched 9/11 fact so
glaring as to suggest the possibility of a
constitutional crisis unlike anything our country has
ever known. In this new study, as in its predecessor,
he simply details the hard, cold evidence that
seriously--and alarmingly--challenges the
independence, impartiality, and thoroughness of the
9/11 Commission. For anyone serious about combating
terrorism, let alone upholding constitutional
democracy, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions
and Distortions, is a must read."

Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers
to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for
four things:

Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot
Spitzer

Immediate investigation in Congressional
hearings.

Media attention to scrutinize and investigate
the evidence.

The formation of a truly independent
citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Bio: http://www.burnsweston.com/biodata/vitae.shtml

Francis Boyle, PhD, LLD

Francis
Boyle, PhD, LLD – Professor of International
Law at the University of Illinois, Champaign. A leading
practitioner and advocate of international law. He was
responsible for drafting the Biological Weapons
Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, the American implementing
legislation for the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention.
He served on the Board of Directors of Amnesty
International (1988-1992), and represented Bosnia-
Herzegovina at the World Court. He holds a Doctor of Law
Magna Cum Laude as well as a Ph.D. in Political Science,
both from Harvard University.

Article 12/13/06: "The real
culprits behind the 2001 anthrax attack on Congress
were most likely US government scientists at the
army's Ft. Detrick, MD., bioterrorism lab according to
a former government biological weapons legislator and
University of Illinois Professor.

Dr. Francis A.
Boyle says the FBI covered up these facts and has also
quite clearly stated that he doubts the official
government story that 19 arabs with boxcutters
perpetrated the attacks of 9/11.

"I believe the
FBI knows exactly who was behind these terrorist
anthrax attacks upon the United States Congress in the
Fall of 2001, and that the culprits were US
government-related scientists involved in a criminal
US government bio-warfare program," Boyle says in his
new book Biowarfare
and Terrorism.

Boyle goes on to
inquire, "Could the real culprits behind the terrorist
attacks on 11 September 2001, and the immediately
following terrorist anthrax attacks upon Congress
ultimately prove to be the same people? Could it truly
be coincidental that two of the primary intended
victims of the terrorist anthrax attacks - Senators
Daschle and Leahy - were holding up the speedy passage
of the pre-planned USA Patriot Act ... an act which
provided the federal government with unprecedented
powers in relation to US citizens and institutions?"
http://infowars.net/articles/december2006/131206Anthrax.htm

Bio: http://www.law.uiuc.edu/faculty/DirectoryResult.asp?Name=Boyle,+Francis

C. Peter Erlinder, JD

C. Peter Erlinder, JD –
Professor of Law, William Mitchell College of Law. Past
President, National Lawyers Guild.

Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers
to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for
four things:

Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot
Spitzer

Immediate investigation in Congressional
hearings.

Media attention to scrutinize and investigate
the evidence.

The formation of a truly independent
citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Bio: http://www.wmitchell.edu/academics/faculty/Erlinder.asp?what=biography&fid=414308

William G. Weaver, JD, PhD
No photo
available

William G. Weaver, JD, PhD
– Associate Professor, Department of Political
Science, Director of Academic Programs, Institute for
Policy and Economic Development, University of Texas, El
Paso, specializing in executive branch secrecy policy,
governmental abuse, and law and bureaucracy. Former U.S.
Army Signals Intelligence officer. Author, co-author,
and editor of several books on law and political theory,
including: Presidential
Secrecy and the Law (2007), New
Perspectives on American Law: An Introduction to Private
Law in Politics and Society (1997), Political
Science and Feminism: Integration or Transformation?
(1997), Pragmatism
in Law and Society (1991).

Essay 9/5/06: Regarding the 9/11
Commission - "In their responsibility to report all
the facts: They either refused to interview all
relevant experts and witnesses, or, they censored the
reports provided to them by those with direct and
first-hand information. Both these acts were selective
and intentional. Contrary to their pledge to establish
accountability: They refused to hold anyone
accountable and lamely justified it by saying, "We
don't want to point a finger at anyone." http://www.nswbc.org/Press%20Releases/NSWBC-911Comm.htm

Bio: http://academics.utep.edu/Default.aspx?tabid=21347

Mark Conrad, JD

Mark Conrad, JD – Assistant
Professor of Criminal Justice at Troy University.
Associate General Counsel, National Association of
Federal Agents. Retired Agent in Charge, Internal
Affairs, U.S. Customs, responsible for the internal
integrity and security for areas encompassing nine
states and two foreign locations. Former Federal Sky
Marshall. 27-year U.S. Customs career.

Signatory of a Letter to Congress
regarding the 9/11 Commission Report 9/13/04,
signed by 25 military, intelligence, and law
enforcement veterans:

"[W]e the
undersigned wish to bring to the attention of the
Congress and the people of the United States what we
believe are serious shortcomings in the report and its
recommendations. …

Omission is one
of the major flaws in the Commission's report. We are
aware of significant issues and cases that were duly
reported to the commission by those of us with direct
knowledge, but somehow escaped attention. …

The omission of
such serious and applicable issues and information by
itself renders the report flawed, and casts doubt on
the validity of many of its recommendations. ...

The Commission,
with its incomplete report of "facts and
circumstances", intentional avoidance of assigning
accountability, and disregard for the knowledge,
expertise and experience of those who actually do the
job, has now set about pressuring our Congress and our
nation to hastily implement all its recommendations.
...

We the
undersigned, who have worked within various government
agencies (FBI, CIA, FAA, DIA, Customs) responsible for
national security and public safety, call upon you in
Congress to include the voices of those with
first-hand knowledge and expertise in the important
issues at hand. We stand ready to do our part." Link to
signatories

Paul Zarembka, PhD

Paul Zarembka, PhD –
Professor of Economics, State University of New York at
Buffalo. Editor, The
Hidden History of 9-11-2001, published by
Elsevier, 2006.

Essay: Initiation of the 9-11
Operation, with Evidence of Insider Trading in
The
Hidden History of 9-11-2001: "The
peer-reviewed study in the Journal of
Business by Allen Poteshman (2006) trumps casual
new remarks about whether the stock market and/or
airline stocks were going down before 9-11 as an
explanation for rising put-option purchases. .. it
goes beyond anecdotal comments ... . It is a
complicated statistical exercise ... Poteshman finds
... these purchases [of options on American Airline
stock] ... had only 1 percent probability of occurring
simply randomly.

We have focused
on option trading in AA [American Airline] and UA
[United Airline]. But there is a lot more to be
discussed in a more complete study. For example,
Mathewson and Nol (2001) report: At Morgan Stanley ...
put options jumped between Sept 6 and Sept 10 , almost
27 times a previous daily average ...

We are not
surprised that the Commission avoided any and all such
types of information."

Editor's note: The 9/11
Commission states in its Monograph
on Terrorist Financing, "The U.S. government
investigation unequivocally concluded that there was
no evidence of illicit trading in the U.S. markets
with knowledge of the terrorist attacks. The
Commission staff, after an independent review of the
government investigation, has discovered no reason to
doubt this conclusion." For more information on
9/11-related investment irregularities, see Ernst
Welteke and William
Bergman.

Website: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka/

Morgan Reynolds, PhD

Morgan Reynolds, PhD –
Professor Emeritus, Economics, Texas A&M University.
Former Director of the Criminal Justice Center at the
National Center for Policy Analysis. Former Chief
Economist, U.S. Department of Labor under George W. Bush
2001 - 2002.

Video 6/2/06: "I first began to
suspect that 9/11 was in inside job when the
Bush-Cheney Administration invaded Iraq. … We can
prove that the government's story is false." http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8180123292618944278

Essay 6/9/05: "It is hard to
exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over
the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers [each
1300+ feet tall, 110 stories] and building
7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is
wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such
erroneous engineering analysis is not likely [to]
prove to be sound." http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html

[Editor's note:
WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories,
and was not hit by an airplane. It would have been the
tallest building in 33 states. However, no mention of
its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's
"full and complete account of the circumstances
surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks." Watch the collapse video here.
And 5 1/2 years after 9/11, the Federal government has
yet to publish its promised final report that explains
the cause of its collapse.]

Bio: http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=bio

Daniel Orr, PhD

Daniel Orr, PhD
– Professor Emeritus and former Chairman of the
Department of Economics, University of Illinois.

Member: Scholars for 9/11
Truth Association Statement: "Research proves
the current administration has been dishonest about
what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The
World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down
by controlled demolitions and that the available
relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the
government's official story about the attack on the
Pentagon."

Bio: http://www.economics.uiuc.edu/Faculty_Profiles/orr.html

Stephen F. LeRoy, PhD

Stephen F. LeRoy, PhD
– Professor of Economics, University of
California, Santa Barbara. Former Visiting Economist,
Federal Reserve Bank.

Member: Scholars for 9/11
Truth Association Statement: "Research proves
the current administration has been dishonest about
what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The
World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down
by controlled demolitions and that the available
relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the
government's official story about the attack on the
Pentagon."

Bio: http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/cgi-bin/faculty.cgi?f=sleroy

Robert G. Horn, MD

Robert G. Horn, MD
– Clinical Professor, Department of Pathology,
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine.

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization
consisting of independent researchers and activists
engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11
attacks."

Bio: http://www.kidneybiopsy.com/

William Willers, PhD
No
photo available

William Willers, PhD – Professor Emeritus, Biology and
Microbiology, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh. Founder
and President, Superior
Wilderness Action Network. Editor of Learning
to Listen to the Land and Unmanaged
Landscapes: Voices For Untamed Nature.

Essay 12/15/06: "On December 8,
The Nation ... published an essay by
Christopher Hayes ... titled "9/11: The Roots of
Paranoia," in which the author ... disparages the
"so-called" 9/11 Truth Movement, which he calls "a
rabbit hole of delusion." ... Two of the scholars he
identifies by name: theologian David
Ray Griffin and physicist Steven
Jones. ...

Regarding
investigative thoroughness, the two scholars cited,
Griffin and Jones, are scrupulous in their
investigative methodology. Moreover, James
Fetzer, a leading 9/11 skeptic and retired
professor of philosophy, has written numerous
well-received books on research technique and
cognitive inquiry. Hayes' suggestion that the Truth
Movement is based on half-baked ideas and lies is
simply untrue.

Nor are 9/11
skeptics of note only in academe. Go to www.patriotsquestion911.com
(really, go to it) and find an astonishing list of
figures who flatly reject the official version of the
9/11 Commission. They include individuals from the
U.S. Senate (e.g., Mark
Dayton, D-MN), the House (e.g., Curt
Weldon, R-PA), the FBI (e.g., Louis
Freeh, former director), the CIA (e.g., Raymond
McGovern and Bill
Christison), the Departments of Defense (e.g., Morton
Goulder, under Nixon, Ford and Carter), Treasury
(e.g., Paul Craig
Roberts, under Reagan), Labor (e.g., Morgan
Reynolds under Bush II), Justice (e.g., John
Loftus, under Carter and Reagan), State (e.g., George
Kenny, under Bush I), and the U.S. Military (e.g.,
Major
General Albert Stubblebine). Given that such open
expressions are dangerous for one's professional life,
it is safe to assume that for each one who comes
forward, there are many remaining silent. ...

Yes, the Truth
Movement "raises questions", and the questions are of
vastly greater importance than any theories that might
arise from them. It is not necessary -- perhaps not
even desirable -- to resort to scenarios that can then
be dashed by the belittling label of "conspiracy"
which, like the word "paranoia", can be applied to
neutralize valid concerns. The questions themselves
are so numerous and significant that demands for
honest answers are implicit within them." http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Dec06/Willers15.htm

Charles H. Hux, MD

Charles H. Hux, MD – Associate
Professor, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. Faculty Member,
Monmouth Medical Center. Obstetrician &
Gynecologist, specialist in
Maternal & Fetal Medicine.

Signatory of Petition of Solidarity to the
Attorney General of New York for a new independent
grand jury investigation of 9/11 11/19/04:
"We the undersigned: a) think that there is
ample evidence and probable cause to believe that many
grave and still unresolved crimes were committed by US
officials prior to, during and after the events of
9/11; b) observe that most of these apparent crimes,
including but not limited to abetment of mass murder,
criminal negligence, insider trading, and obstruction
of justice fall well within the jurisdiction of New
York's top law enforcement officials ..." http://www.justicefor911.org/

Member: Scholars for 9/11
Truth Association Statement: "Research proves
the current administration has been dishonest about
what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The
World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down
by controlled demolitions and that the available
relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the
government's official story about the attack on the
Pentagon."

Faiz Khan, MD

Faiz Khan, MD
– Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine,
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY. Director of
Medical Observation Unit and Assistant Residency
Director - Emergency Medicine, Hershey Medical Center,
Penn State College of Medicine. Practicing physician
with dual board specialization in Emergency and Internal
Medicine. A 9/11 first responder.

Co-founder: Muslim-Jewish-Christian
Alliance for 9/11 Truth, a group of scholars,
religious leaders and activists dedicated to uniting
members of the Jewish, Christian and Islamic faiths in
pursuit of 9/11 truth.

Signatory 11/19/04: Complaint
filed with the Attorney General, State of New York for
a new independent grand jury investigation of 9/11.

"We, the
complainant signatories below, petition the Attorney
General of New York, on behalf of millions of New
Yorkers who also call for a fearless independent
inquiry; for the sake of residents, workers, and
business owners in New York—most particularly in and
near "Ground Zero"; and also on behalf of other
Americans who have lost employees, friends, and family
members as well as health, business, and personal
assets and civil, privacy, and other rights in the
events of September 11, 2001 and their aftermath.

We
approach your office as concerned citizens desiring to
bring to light the truth about the events of 9/11." http://www.justicefor911.org/Complainant_Signatures_111904.php

Bio: http://www.suficircle.com/event-khan.html

John Pepper, PhD

John Pepper, PhD –
Assistant Professor, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,
University of Arizona.

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization
consisting of independent researchers and activists
engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11
attacks."

Bio: http://eebweb.arizona.edu/Faculty/Bios/pepper.html

CV: http://www.santafe.edu/~jpepper/CV.htm

Marcus
Raskin, JD

Marcus Raskin, JD
– Senior Fellow and Professor
of Policy Studies, George Washington University.
Co-founder and Senior Fellow of the Institute for
Policy Studies. Former member of the special staff
of the National Security Council in President Kennedy's
Administration. Advisor to the Episcopal Urban Bishops.
Former member of the Presidential Commission on
Education and advisor to the Bureau of the Budget and
the Office of Science and Technology in the Executive
Office of the President. Author, co-author and editor of
more than 20 books on national security and domestic
affairs, including The
Four Freedoms under Siege: The Clear and Present Danger
from Our National Security State (2006), In
Democracy's Shadow: The Secret World of National
Security (2005), Liberalism
(2003), Visions
and Revisions: Reflections on Culture and Democracy at
the End of the Century (1998), Abolishing
the War System (1992), The
Common Good: Its Politics, Policies, and
Philosophy (1986), The
Politics of National Security (1979).

Endorsement of The
New Pearl Harbor: "This is an
important, extraordinarily well-reasoned and
provocative book that should be widely read. Griffin
raises disturbing questions that deserve thoughtful
and truthful answers from our government." http://personal.nbnet.nb.ca/sveniot/nph/

Bio: http://www.ips-dc.org/bios.htm#Marcus%20Raskin

John D. Maguire, PhD

John D. Maguire,
PhD – President Emeritus since
1998 of the Claremont University Consortium, and a
Senior Fellow and faculty member of Claremont Graduate
University's School of Politics and Economics. He
concurrently serves as a fellow at the Institute for
Democratic Renewal, directing projects on racial and
social justice and the renewal of democracy. He served
as president of the State University of New York's
College at Old Westbury from 1970-81. Dr. Maguire serves
on the boards of the NAACP Legal Defense and
Education Fund, the Tomas Rivera Policy
Institute, the Eureka
Communities and Union Theological
Seminary. Former Director of the Salzburg, Austria
Seminar. Member of the Council on Foreign
Relations. Fellow of the Society for Values in Higher
Education. Senior Consultant to Project
Change.

Review of The
New Pearl Harbor 4/27/04: "I found
Griffin's
book a profoundly disturbing compendium of all the
arguments for why there has been a conspiracy around
9/11. He begins with a table of eight levels of
complicity, from little to overwhelming and lets the
reader decide where along the scale reality may lie.
Two reminders of my Yale training jumped to mind: one
was Leslie Weatherhead's distinction between the
permissive and ordaining wills of God; some things God
allows to happen; other things God directs to happen.
(Application. Since it is overwhelmingly clear the
Bushies knew such an attack was coming, did they--so
overwhelmed with a passion to get into a war with
Iraq--simply allow the events of 9/11 or actually
conspire and were involved in various ways in their
happening?) The other "ancient artifact" is Griffin's
style of presentation. It reminded me deeply of St.
Thomas' Summas, more Contra Gentiles than Theologica.
Griffin methodically lays out the argument, gives you
counter arguments and leads you to the profoundly
disturbing conclusion that not only was there
complicity, there was conspiracy." http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A2D73RD2OMD47A/ref=cm_cr_auth/105-8009672-4038058?tag=wanttinfo-20

Bio: http://www.race-democracy.org/ABOUT_BIOS.htm

John Rensenbrink, PhD

John Rensenbrink, PhD
– Professor Emeritus and former Chair of the Department
of Government, Bowdoin College. Co-founder, US Green
Party. Author of Against
All Odds: The Green Transformation of American Politics
.

Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers
to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for
four things:

Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot
Spitzer

Immediate investigation in Congressional
hearings.

Media attention to scrutinize and investigate
the evidence.

The formation of a truly independent
citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

James G. Smart, PhD
No photo available

James G. Smart, PhD –
Professor Emeritus of History, Keene State College.
Former Assistant Professor of History, University of
Chattanooga.

Member: Scholars for 9/11
Truth Association Statement: "Research proves
the current administration has been dishonest about
what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The
World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down
by controlled demolitions and that the available
relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the
government's official story about the attack on the
Pentagon."

Georg Kreis, PhD

Georg Kreis, PhD – Professor
of History and Director of the Europe Institut of the
University of Basel. President, Swiss Federal Commission
Against Racism.

Tages Anzeiger Article 9/9/06:
"If the official and final investigation of
September 11th only speaks of the collapse of two
skyscrapers [omitting the
collapse of Building 7, 610 feet tall, 47 stories,
and not hit by an airplane] , while in fact and truth
three skyscrapers collapsed in Manhattan, then it is
difficult to classify the Kean
Report as a solid historical source for the monumental
incident that is 9/11."
English translation:
http://www.danieleganser.ch
Original in German:
http://www.danieleganser.ch/zeitungsartikel/pdf/GanserDererbitterteStreitumden11.SeptemberTagesAnzeiger9.Sept2006.pdf

[Editor's note:
WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories,
and was not hit by an airplane. It would have been the
tallest building in 33 states. However, no mention of
its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's
"full and complete account of the circumstances
surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks." Watch the collapse video here.
And 5 1/2 years after 9/11, the Federal government has
yet to publish its promised final report that explains
the cause of its collapse.]

Bio: http://www.europa.unibas.ch/cms4/index.php?id=40&L=2

Melvin A. Goodman, PhD

Melvin A. Goodman, PhD –
Senior Fellow at the Center for International Policy and
Adjunct Professor of International Relations at Johns
Hopkins University. Professor of International Security
at the National War College 1986 - 2004. Former Division
Chief and Senior Analyst at the Office of Soviet
Affairs, CIA,1966 - 1990. Senior Analyst at the Bureau
of Intelligence and Research, State Department, 1974 -
1976. Author and co-author of several books on
international relations, including: Wars
of Eduard Shevardnadze, Gorbachev's
Retreat: The Third World, and Bush
League Diplomacy: How the Neoconservatives Are Putting
the World at Risk.

Congressional briefing testimony 7/22/05
(p.85): "I think the 9/11
Commission has taught me that we need to be extremely
rigorous and extremely tenacious in pursuing that
truth, because there is a corporate mentality in this
country that is working against allowing the truth to
surface, even in tragedies, such as the 9/11 tragedy.
...

I want
to talk about the [9/11] Commission itself, about the
flawed process of the Commission and finally about the
conflict of interest within the Commission that is
extremely important to understand the failure of the
Commission." http://www.vt911.org/McKinneyReport20050722transcript.pdf

Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers
to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for
four things:

Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot
Spitzer

Immediate investigation in Congressional
hearings.

Media attention to scrutinize and investigate
the evidence.

The formation of a truly independent
citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Bio: http://ciponline.org/biographies.htm

Major John M. Newman, PhD

Major John M. Newman, PhD, U.S. Army
(ret) – Professor of History and International
Relations, University of Maryland. Former Executive
Assistant to the Director of the National Security
Agency. Former military attaché in China. 21-year career
in U.S. Army Intelligence.

Congressional briefing testimony 7/22/05
(p.36): "It falls to me this
morning to bring to your attention the story of Saeed
Sheikh, whose full name is Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh,
and his astonishing rise to power in Al Qaeda, his
crucial role in 9/11, which is completely, utterly,
missing from the 9/11 Commission report…

The 9/11
Commission which studied US intelligence and law
enforcement community performance in great detail,
(maybe not so much great detail, but they did),
neglected to cover the community's performance during
the weeks following the attacks to determine who was
responsible for them, not a word about that in the
Report.

The Report does
discuss the immediate US responses but the immediate
investigation is never addressed, and anyone who has
closely studied the post-9/11 investigation knows that
the first breakthrough came two weeks into the
investigation when the money transfers from the United
Arab Emirates to the hijackers were uncovered.

Furthermore, if
you have studied that investigation, you know there is
no disputing that while investigators may have
struggled with the identity of the paymaster, they
were clear about one thing, he was Al Qaeda's finance
chief. For this reason alone you have to ask why the
9/11 Commission Report never mentions the finance
chief's role as the 9/11 paymaster." http://www.vt911.org/McKinneyReport20050722transcript.pdf

Michael M. Andregg, PhD

Michael M. Andregg, PhD –
Professor, Justice and Peace Studies, University of St.
Thomas. Lecturer, University of Minnesota. Founder and
Director of the Center for the Study of Intelligence and
Wisdom, at Ground Zero Minnesota (a non-profit
educational organization) 1982 - present. Author of
On
the Causes of War, winner, National
Peacewriting Award for 1999.

Statement to this website 1/9/07:
"There is persuasive physical, photographic and other
evidence to support the hypotheses of controlled
demolition of the towers and of a cruise missile at
the Pentagon rather than a full-sized, commercial
aircraft. These require inside operators, and there is
evidence of 3 or 4 intelligence agencies active behind
the screen of Osama bin Laden and his 19 - 200
associates. Much of that evidence of involvement by
intelligence agencies is independent of the evidence
of controlled demolitions, yet must be accounted for
either way one goes on engineering and physics issues.
The really daunting question is what to do about this
national and international security crisis once one
accepts the physical impossibility of the official
story."

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice

Member: Scientific Panel
Investigating Nine-Eleven Association Statement:
"We have found solid scientific grounds on which to
question the interpretation put upon the events of
September 11, 2001 by the Office of the President of
the United States of America and subsequently
propagated by the major media of western nations."

Bio: Ph.D. in genetics,
University of California Davis, 1977. Medical genetics
research at University of Minnesota 1977 - 1979.
Instructor, University of Minnesota, 1981 - present.
Professor, University of St. Thomas 1993 - present.
Founder and Director of the Center for the Study of
Intelligence and Wisdom, at Ground Zero Minnesota 1982
- present.

Carolyn Baker, PhD

Carolyn Baker, PhD
– Adjunct Professor of History, New Mexico
State University. Author and former psychotherapist. Her
books include U.S.
History Uncensored: What Your High School Textbook
Didn't Tell You (2006), The
Journey of Forgiveness: Fulfilling The Healing
Process (2000), and Reclaiming
the Dark Feminine: The Price of Desire (1996).

Review of 9/11
and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out
1/18/07: "Professors David
Ray Griffin and Peter
Dale Scott have edited a masterpiece of critical
thinking and scholarly analysis in this collection of
articles by intellectuals who have broken silence on
the atrocities of September 11, 2001. ...

In my opinion,
one of the most important aspects of critical thinking
is asking questions which is due, in part, to my
preference for questions rather than answers written
in stone. This is the paramount reason for my
enthusiastic support for the 9/11 truth movement. As
long as a community of thinkers, and indeed, the
citizenry at large, continue to question the events of
September 11, there is at least a spark of hope that
at some point, with the proper conditions and at the
right time, that spark might be fanned into a flame of
revolution." Link
to the review

Article originally published in From
the Wilderness 9/06 : "On this fifth
anniversary of the horror that gripped America on
September 11, 2001, one thing feels extraordinarily
appropriate to me: Acknowledging not only our grief
for the innocent victims of that day's butchery, but
our grief for all of the valiant men and women who
have sacrificed everything but their lives to illumine
the reality of the coup d'etat that took
place on that day as the United States government
orchestrated the attacks then immediately implemented
its pathetic, shabby coverup which non-questioning
Americans have accepted ever since." http://www.intellectualthought.com/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=976

Bio: http://carolynbaker.org/administrative/about-me

James Petras,
PhD

James Petras, PhD – Bartle
Professor Emeritus of Sociology at Binghamton
University, SUNY, New York, and Adjunct Professor at
Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Nova Scotia. Author
and co-author of numerous books on society, economic
systems, and social justice, including: Mediterranean
Paradoxes: The Politics and Social Structure of Southern
Europe (1994), Globalization
Unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st Century
(2001), The
Dynamics of Social Change in Latin America
(2004), A
System in Crisis: The Dynamics of Free Market
Capitalism (2004), Social
Movements and State Power (2005), Empire
with Imperialism: The Globalizing Dynamics of Neoliberal
Capitalism (2006)

Essay 4/6/03: "... Al Queda as an
effective international terrorist organization
never existed - nor has it even come into
existence under conditions of maximum Western
terrorist assault on a Muslim population.

The idea of an
'international terrorist conspiracy' was completely
fabricated by Washington and embellished by the empty
bellicose rhetoric of Bin Laden, a leader without a
following, a leader created by the mass media, a
leader incapable of directing a single operative
terrorist attack.

If there is no
evidence of the operative existence of Al Queda, and
if Bin Laden has no effective following, it is clear
there never was any terrorist conspiracy. The idea was
fabricated by Washington to justify previous plans
designed by Wolfowitz and Perle (1992, 1998) to
conquer the Middle East.

The fact that
the 'worldwide terrorist conspiracy' is a clear
fabrication, raises fundamental questions about
the event which triggered the US drive for
military conquest - 9/11.

It is now a well
known fact that there was no connection between Iraq
and Bin Laden/Al Queda, despite forceful efforts by
Colin Powell to present the UN with bogus evidence.
But what is equally important, the US, the UN, Tony
Blair, the Afghan narco-warlords and other US allies
have never found a single piece of evidence linking
Bin Laden/Al Queda with the terrorist incidents of
9/11. ... The logical conclusion is that Bin Laden/Al
Queda had at best a marginal role, if any. What we do
know is that several of the terrorists easily obtained
multiple entry visas in Saudi Arabia from the US
embassy. That at least two of the hijackers were
trained at US military bases. That the FBI and CIA had
prior notice of a hijacking and let the operatives
proceed. That Condaleeza Rice admitted to prior
knowledge of a "traditional hijacking" a short time
before it occurred. That US airforce planes were not
commanded to action until after the hijackers
succeeded. ... At the least we can say that those who
fabricated stories of weapons of mass destruction, of
Iraqis welcoming US invaders, of all powerful
international terrorist organizations are at the least
capable of fabricating the story of 9/11." http://www.rebelion.org/petras/english/030411alqueda.htm

Bio: http://en.wikigadugi.org/wiki/James_Petras

Ralph Metzner, PhD

Ralph Metzner, PhD –
Psychologist and Professor Emeritus of Psychology,
California Institute of Integral Studies and former
Academic Dean, California Institute of Integral Studies.
Author of Maps of Consciousness, The Well of
Remembrance, The Unfolding Self, and
Green Psychology.

Statement to this website 1/13/07:
"I've come to believe, in accord with many
people who are certainly far more qualified than I am
to arrive at informed judgments on this matter, and
who can in no sense of the word be regarded as
"conspiracy theorists", that the official 9/11 story
is an unbelievable cover-up of a major crime against
the American people and the world. For the sake of our
collective soul and the future of our world, this
story cries out to be investigated and the truth made
known. Only the truth will set us free. ... As one of
my teachers used to say: "knowing the truth has never
hurt anyone". And we all know the corrupting effect of
lies and deceit."

Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers
to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for
four things:

Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot
Spitzer

Immediate investigation in Congressional
hearings.

Media attention to scrutinize and investigate
the evidence.

The formation of a truly independent
citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Bio: http://www.ciis.edu/faculty/metzner.html

Marilynn M. Rosenthal, PhD

Marilynn M. Rosenthal,
PhD – Professor Emerita of Sociology,
University of Michigan. Adjunct Professor, Department of
Internal Medicine, UM Medical School. Elected Fellow of
the British and Swedish Royal Societies of Medicine.
Recipient of numerous grants and honors, including a
Danforth Fellowship, UM Hopwood writing award, a
Distinguished Faculty Research Award and a Fulbright
Western European Research Award. Her son, Josh
Rosenthal, a portfolio manager at Fiduciary Trust
International, was a victim of the collapse of the World
Trade Center South Tower. Author or co-author of
numerous books about the practice of medicine,
including: Medical
Error (2002), Medical
Mishaps (1999), Health
Policy: Understanding Our Choices (1998),
Medical
Mishaps (1997). The
Incompetent Doctor: Behind Closed Doors (1995),
Health
Care Systems and Their Patients: An International
Perspective (1992), Dealing
with Medical Malpractice: British and Swedish
Experience (1988), Health
Care in the People's Republic of China (1987).

Signatory of Petition to Release
Information Pertaining to 9/11 10/5/06: "We,
the undersigned, demand the immediate declassification
and release of:

all transcripts and documents relating to the
July 10, 2001 meeting that took place between former
CIA Director George Tenet and then National Security
Advisor, Condoleezza Rice. It has been alleged that
this urgent and out-of-the-ordinary meeting was
called to discuss the increasingly dire warnings of
an imminent al Qaeda attack within the U.S. ...

the redacted 28 pages of the Joint Inquiry Into
The Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 (JICI),
and

the CIA Inspector General's report, CIA
Accountability With Respect To The 9/11 Attacks

Personal statement in support of above
petition: "The American Public will no longer
tolerate the dishonest use of "national security" as
an excuse for keeping information from the American
people. It's bad enough that knowledge of the July
10th 2001 meeting was kept hidden so long." http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?july10&9851

Bio: http://www.med.umich.edu/psm/rosenthal.html

David MacGregor,
PhD

David MacGregor,
PhD – Professor, Department of
Sociology, King's University College at the University
of Western Ontario.

Contributing author, The
Hidden History of 9-11-2001
("September 11 as "Machiavellian State
Terror"), published by Elsevier, 2006: "September
11 may be an example of expedient destruction, ordered
from within the state ... Machiavelian state terror
advances the ruling agenda while disguising itself as
the work of individuals or groups opposed to the
state's fundamental principles. ...

I want to show
how September 11 follows a typical pattern: a
convenient terrorist event explained by the media in
terms of widely shared stereotypical understandings
and then embellished and deepened by compliant
intellectuals."

Bio: http://publish.uwo.ca/~mcgregor/personal.html

William Woodward, PhD
No photo
available

William Woodward, PhD –
Professor of Psychology, University of New Hampshire.
Co-author of B.
F. Skinner and Behaviorism in American Culture.

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization
consisting of independent researchers and activists
engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11
attacks."

Bio: http://www.unh.edu/psychology/faculty/fac_woodward.htm

Catherine Lowther, PhD
No photo
available

Catherine Lowther, PhD –
Professor of Psychology, Goddard College.

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization
consisting of independent researchers and activists
engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11
attacks."

Charles Simpson,
PhD
No photo available

Charles Simpson,
PhD – Professor of Sociology,
State University of New York, Plattsburgh.

Member: Vermonters
for a Real 9/11 Investigation Association
Statement: "We do support a new, thorough, and
truly independent forensic investigation of the events
on and surrounding 9/11/2001. We believe that
without such an investigation, the threat of further
attacks like those of 9/11 remains unabated, our
government will continue to erode our civil liberties,
and our government will continue to support foreign
policies that are destructive to the U.S. and to the
world."
(State University of New York is mentioned
for identification purposes only and in no way
signifies the University's views on this matter.)

Bio: http://www.plattsburgh.edu/academics/sociology/faculty/simpson.php

Diana Ralph, PhD
No photo
available

Diana Ralph, PhD – Associate
Professor, School of Social Work, Carleton University.
Author of Work
and Madness: The Rise of Community Psychiatry.

Contributing author, The
Hidden History of 9/11
("Islamophobia and the "War On Terror":
The Continuing Pretext for U.S. Imperial
Conquest"), published by Elsevier, 2006:
"Researchers are uncovering extensive, credible
evidence that the official account of the 9-11 attacks
is untenable. Although al-Qaeda may have had the
resources to get hijackers onto planes with box
cutters, it did not have the power to shut down FBI
investigations of suspected hijackers, to set up
distracting war games on 9-11-2001, to issue
stand-down orders preventing effective military
response, or to cause two WTC towers [each 1300+ feet
tall, 110 stories] plus Building
7 [610 feet tall, 47 stories, and not hit by an
airplane] to collapse using demolition explosives. ...
Western intelligence knew about the 9-11 attack plans
as early as 1995, and may have facilitated and
exploited them for their own ends. Some suggest that
the U.S. may even have directly planned and carried
them out. Regardless of whether it simply facilitated
the attacks or carried them out themselves, there is
little doubt that the U.S. was involved."

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization
consisting of independent researchers and activists
engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11
attacks."

Angana Chatterji, PhD

Angana Chatterji, PhD –
Associate Professor of Social and Cultural Anthropology,
California Institute of Integral Studies.

Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers
to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for
four things:

Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot
Spitzer

Immediate investigation in Congressional
hearings.

Media attention to scrutinize and investigate
the evidence.

The formation of a truly independent
citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Bio: http://www.ciis.edu/faculty/chatterji.html

Benjamin Demott, PhD

Benjamin Demott, PhD (1924
- 2005) – Mellon Professor of
Humanities Emeritus, Amherst College. Former board
member, John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation.
Author of several works of cultural criticism, including
Junk
Politics: The Trashing of the American Mind
(2005), Killer
Woman Blues: Why Americans Can't Think Straight about
Gender and Power (2000) and The
Trouble With Friendship: Why Americans Can't Think
Straight about Race (1995).

Essay in Harpers Magazine, 10/04
Whitewash as Public Service: "The
plain, sad reality—I report this following four full
days studying the work—is that The 9/11 Commission
Report, despite the vast quantity of labor behind
it, is a cheat and a fraud. It stands as a series of
evasive maneuvers that infantilize the audience,
transform candor into iniquity, and conceal realities
that demand immediate inspection and confrontation.
...

At the
core of all these failures lies a deep wariness of
earnest, well-informed public debate. ...

There's little
mystery about why the Commission is
tongue-tied. It can't call a liar a liar. ...

The Commission,
in sum, offers peace through exculpation, evasion, and
entertainment—and in doing so dangerously reenergizes
a national relish for fantasy." http://www.harpers.org/WhitewashAsPublicService.html

Bio: http://www.boston.com/news/globe/obituaries/articles/2005/10/01/dr_benjamin_demott_81_was_academician_author_and_critic/

Eric Larsen, PhD

Eric Larsen, PhD -
Professor of English, John Jay College of Criminal
Justice, City University of New York 1971 - 2006. Author
of A
Nation Gone Blind - America in an Age of Simplification
and Deceit (2006) and two novels, An
American Memory (1989) and I
Am Zoë Handke (1994).

Endorsement of The
9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and
Distortions: "The 9/11
Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions
...... Exactly what it says. If you read
the actual commission report and then read Griffin's
point by point perusal and rebuttal of it,
you'll be overwhelmed. Even if you don't read the
actual report first, Griffin's effect is very nearly
the same, since the care he takes to synopsize
wherever necessary or useful, the ease of his pace,
and the measured, calm, never sensational
quality of his method and his voice all fill
you in not only about what is in the report
but what isn't. The result overall: Anyone
who reads Griffin's book with an open mind and with an
empirically based acceptance of commonsense logic—no
such person will leave Omissions and
Distortions without have been convinced that the
"Kean
Commission Report" is an enormous, partisan coverup,
or, as Griffin himself has says, "a 571-page lie." http://www.ericlarsen.net/foodforthought11.4.G.html

Essay "The Great Crime of 9/11"
11/5/06: "Book after book (see the bibliography
at the end of Part Four), article after article,
scholar after scholar—all of them provide
overwhelmingly numerous examples of the absolute
absurdity not only of the "official theory" itself of
9/11 but also of the "Kean
Commission" report—and at the same time they show the
absolute obviousness of 9/11 having been in fact a
"black flag operation," a self-inflicted wound and
self-generated "attack," whether one that was planned
and perpetrated by the Bushiscti themselves (probably
not), or by what Webster Tarpley calls the "oligarchy"
or the "invisible" or the "rogue" government that's
actually in control of the nation—these
questions are matters for scholarship, and they've
been and are still being ever more deeply and
accurately explored through scholarship."
http://www.ericlarsen.net/foodforthought11.2.html

Member: Scholars for 9/11
Truth

Bio: http://www.ericlarsen.net/about.html

Richard McGinn, PhD

Richard McGinn, PhD –
Professor Emeritus and former Department Chairman,
Linguistics and Southeast Asian Studies, Ohio
University. Former President, Consortium of Teachers of
Southeast Asian Languages.

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization
consisting of independent researchers and activists
engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11
attacks."

CV: http://www.cats.ohiou.edu/linguistics/dept/Mcginn.html

Marcus Ford, PhD
No photo
available

Marcus Ford, PhD – Professor,
Humanities Department, and Past President, Faculty
Senate, Northern Arizona University.

Review of Christian
Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11 8/18/06:
"This is an important book, not simply
because of the evidence it marshals in support of the
claim that US officials planned and carried out the
savage attacks on 9/11, but also because it places
this argument within the wider context of how
governments, including our own, have sometimes
resorted to deadly and deceptive measures in order to
advance their own causes. Even if there were no
evidence to support the claim that the attacks of 9/11
were carried out by the US--and there is overwhelming
evidence that it was--this book would be valuable in
terms of its understanding of the nature of empires,
recent American foreign policy, Jesus' teachings, and
the role that religion (in this case Christianity)
should play in modern life. ...

Like all of Griffin's
books this book is extremely well-documented, but
unlike some of his books, it is also very readable.
This is a book that must be read and discussed. Buy a
copy, and buy additional copies for friends and
libraries"

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization
consisting of independent researchers and activists
engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11
attacks."

Michael Keefer, PhD

Michael Keefer, PhD –
Professor, College of Arts, University of Guelph. Former
President, Association of Canadian College and
University Teachers of English. Graduate, Royal Military
College of Canada.

Essay, a rebuttal to Alexander Cockburn
12/16/06: "As anyone who presumes to hold
forth on this aspect of the 9/11 evidence should know,
what is really incriminating about the failure to
intercept the aircraft which were flown on that day
into the Twin Towers and (by the official account)
into the Pentagon is not the simple absence of
fighter-interceptors over New York and Washington, but
rather the fact that that absence was ensured by a
series of concurrent military exercises which had
transferred most of the available interceptors out of
the northeastern region, and which for a crucial
period that morning left the military air traffic
controllers responsible for vectoring the remaining
fighters into position unable to determine which of
the many blips appearing on their radar screens
represented actual as opposed to simulated threats. We
can add to this what seems the no less incriminating
testimony of Transportation Secretary Norman
Mineta to the 9/11 Commission, which suggests very
strongly that Vice President Cheney had ordered a
stand-down of missile defenses protecting Washington
DC. ...

But like the
9/11 Commission, he [Cockburn] manages quietly to
forget about the
collapse of WTC 7 late in the afternoon of 9/11:
this [610 feet tall] 47-story steel-framed tower,
which was damaged by debris from the North Tower but
not struck by any aircraft, collapsed at free-fall
speed into its own footprint in what half a dozen
different videos show to have been a classic implosion
demolition. Significantly, FEMA and NIST have failed
to offer any plausible alternative explanation of this
collapse.

As to the
questions of how, when, or by whom demolition charges
may have been planted: there is evidence, though
Cockburn may not be interested in exploring it, of
activity on unoccupied floors of the Twin Towers just
prior to 9/11 that is consistent with the placing of
such charges." http://www.911truth.org/article_for_printing.php?story=20061206104001101

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice

Bio: http://www.mos.umu.se/seminarier/translation_may06/Michael_Keefer_cv.pdf

Robert
Scheer

Robert Scheer – Director of
the Privacy Project and Clinical Professor, Annenberg
School for Communication, University of Southern
California. Former instructor University of California;
Irvine campus, Los Angeles campus, and Berkeley campus.
30-year journalistic career. Former Managing Editor and
Editor-in-Chief of Ramparts magazine. For 15
years, National Correspondent for the Los Angeles
Times. Currently, Co-founder and Editor-in-Chief of
truthdig.com, an
online magazine. Author of Playing
President: My Close Encounters with Nixon, Carter, Bush
I and Clinton (2006), The
Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us about Iraq
(2003), Essays
on the Pornography of Power (1991); With
Enough Shovels: Reagan, Bush and Nuclear War
(1982), and America
After Nixon: The Age of Multinationals (1974).

Essay Gaping Holes in the 9/11
Narrative 9/11 06: "What we still don't
know about 9/11 could kill us. By "we" I mean the
public that has been kept in the dark for five years
by a president who may know the truth but has chosen
to ignore it. ...

Last week, Bush
conceded that there were indeed secret CIA prisons,
when finally announcing that the group of "key
witnesses" to the 9/11 disaster would be moved to
Guantanamo and for once afforded visits from the Red
Cross and minimal legal representation. Some of them
have been interrogated in secret for up to five years,
with the Bush Administration left as the sole
interpreter of what they revealed.

After five years
of official deceit, it is not too difficult to believe
that the isolation of those prisoners was done less
for reasons of learning the truth about 9/11 and more
in an effort to politically manage the narrative
released to the public.

There is glaring
evidence that the latter was the case. The 9/11
Commission report contains a disclaimer box on page
146, in which it is stated that the report's account
of what happened on 9/11 was in considerable measure
based on what those key witnesses allegedly told
interrogators, and that the commissioners were not
allowed to meet the witnesses or their interrogators.

"We
submitted questions for use in the interrogations, but
had no control over whether, when or how questions of
particular interest would be asked. Nor were we
allowed to talk to the interrogators so that we could
better judge the credibility of the detainees and
clarify ambiguities in the reporting."

In short, the
most cited source that we have on what happened on
9/11, the much celebrated 9/11 Commission Report, was
stage-managed by the Bush administration, just as it
has controlled and distorted so much other
information.

In light of that
sorry record of the propagandistic exploitation of the
9/11 tragedy for partisan political purpose, is it any
wonder that large numbers of Americans have doubts
about all of it and that a considerable industry of
documentaries and investigative reports has sprung up
with alternative theories ranging from the plausible
to the absurd? http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0911-25.htm

Bio: http://annenberg.usc.edu/Faculty/Communication/ScheerR.aspx#expand

Mark Crispin Miller, PhD

Mark Crispin Miller, PhD –
Professor, Culture and Communication, New York
University.

Endorsement of 9/11
and American Empire (Vol I) – Intellectuals Speak
Out: "For far too long, the very
reasonable questions raised by 9/11 have been ignored
and even ridiculed by America's press and politicians,
who treat the subject with the sort of willful
blindness that suggests a wish not to find out
unpleasant truths. We, the people, therefore owe the
editors of this important new collection our warm
thanks for their intelligent and unrelenting work." http://www.interlinkbooks.com/product_info.php?products_id=1545&osCsid=5a22b94fffd724962a118f454c5d7194

Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers
to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for
four things:

Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot
Spitzer

Immediate investigation in Congressional
hearings.

Media attention to scrutinize and investigate
the evidence.

The formation of a truly independent
citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Bio: http://steinhardt.nyu.edu/steinhardt/db/faculty/1216

Joseph C. Hough, Jr.,
PhD

Joseph C. Hough, Jr., PhD
– President of the Faculty and
William E. Dodge Professor of Social Ethics, Union
Theological Seminary, Columbia University. Former Dean,
Vanderbilt Divinity School. Ordained minister in the
United Church of Christ, Congregational. Author of Christian
Identity and Theological Education (1985), Beyond
Clericalism: The Congregation As a Focus for Theological
Education (1988), Theology
and the University (1991), The
Theological Work of the University Scholar
(1992).

Endorsement of The
New Pearl Harbor: "Griffin's
The New Pearl Harbor ought to be read by any
American who values our democracy and understands the
importance of retaining the basic trust of the people
for any such democracy to survive over time." http://physics911.ca/Griffin:_The_New_Pearl_Harbor

Bio: http://www.uts.columbia.edu/index.php?id=319

Richard A. Horsley, PhD

Richard A. Horsley, PhD –
Distinguished Professor of Liberal Arts and Former Chair
of the Department of the Study of Religion, University
of Massachusetts, Boston. Author of more than fifty
articles and a dozen books on religion and society,
including; Christian
Origins: A People's History Of Christianity
(2006), Religion
and Empire: People, Power, and the Life of the
Spirit (2003), Jesus
and Empire: The Kingdom of God and the New World
Disorder (2002).

Endorsement of Christian
Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11 7/1/06:
"Do American Christians want the United
States to act like the New Rome, invading other
countries to impose its imperial rule and its control
of other peoples' resources? That, however, is just
what the US is doing, increasingly so since 9/11,
explains David
Griffin. In this gripping summary of evidence for
the truth behind 9/11 and the 9/11 Commission report,
Griffin makes a compelling case that the imperial
practices of the American government have become a
destructive force in the world. And he clarifies the
biblical and theological basis for Christians to
challenge the resurgent American imperialism that
often claims divine blessing on its destructive
actions." http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0664231179/sr=1-3/qid=1153502451/ref=pd_bbs_3/104-4936322-3591918?tag=wanttinfo-20&ie=UTF8&s=books

Clark A. Kucheman, PhD

Clark A. Kucheman, PhD –
Arthur V. Stoughton Professor of Christian Ethics,
Claremont McKenna College. Former Assistant Professor,
Divinity School, University of Chicago. Former
Lieutenant, U.S. Air Force. Contributing author, Ethics,
Religion, and the Good Society: New Directions in a
Pluralistic World (1992) and Terrorism,
Justice and Social Values (1990). Editor,
The
Life of Choice: Some Liberal Religious Perspectives on
Morality (1978).

Review of The
New Pearl Harbor 4/8/04: "Having
been kept awake nights in the Bachelor Officer's
Quarters at McGuire Air Force Base, NJ, by both Air
Force and Navy jet fighters revving and taking off
through the night in defense of New York City, I have
wondered why, contrary to standard operating
procedure, no McGuire jets were scrambled on 9/11. The
standard operating procedure is to intercept aircraft
that are off course or out of communication, but -
even after the first tower was hit - this was not
done. Having read Griffin's
book, and even though he does not claim to have a
conclusive answer to my question, I am beginning to
understand. In fact, I am aware of and beginning to
understand much much else as well. And I shudder.

It may be
too hot for the popular media to handle, but everyone
- especially Air Force and Navy Air Corps veterans -
should read and think carefully about the evidence and
arguments considered in this book." http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A2D8I3CC49ASDL/ref=cm_pdp_profile_reviews/105-8009672-4038058?tag=wanttinfo-20&ie=UTF8&sort_by=MostRecentReview

Bio: http://academic.claremontmckenna.edu/faculty/profile.asp?Fac=46

Helen L. Goggin,
EdD
No photo available

Helen L. Goggin,
EdD – Professor Emerita of
Religious Education, Knox College, University of
Toronto. Contributing author, Theologies
of Religious Education (1995).

Review of The
New Pearl Harbor 4/3/04: "David
Ray Griffin ... has written a very accessible book
on the most complex event in the recent history of the
United States - The New Pearl Harbor. The
book makes no accusations but presents the
accumulative questions and the events on which they
are based in a manner that is compellingly persuasive
of the need for a new fully independent investigative
commission to be struck. In total the questions and
events ask - was the Bush administration complicit in
the events of 9/11? Yes, no one wants to believe such
a possibility but the unanswered questions are
startling. ... This is the most disturbing and
chilling book I have ever read. This is a must read!"
http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A1XP4T6DML5C9N/ref=cm_pdp_profile_reviews/105-8009672-4038058?tag=wanttinfo-20&ie=UTF8&sort%5Fby=MostRecentReview

Review of The
9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and
Distortions 5/5/05: "David
Ray Griffin is a retired professor of theology and
philosophy at the School of Theology in Claremont,
California. This book [is] essential reading for both
Americans and Canadians. David raises many questions
about the official account of 9/11 in his first book
and now in this second one he goes through the
findings of the 9/11 Commission which he believes both
ignored and distorted the mounting evidence that the
official story cannot be the correct one. Griffin
spoke to an assembly at the University of Wisconsin
recently and the address was shown on C-SPAN. For him
there is little doubt now that the Bush Administration
was involved. The responses to the address were shock
and surprise but the evidence presented was
overwhelming. It is urgent for the people of both
United States and Canada to at least become aware of
the evidence presented in these two books. The
unanswered questions are deeply troubling." http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A1SJ3FD15GS5S0?tag=wanttinfo-20&ie=UTF8&sort_by=MostRecentReview

Douglas Sturm, PhD
No photo
available

Douglas Sturm, PhD –
Professor Emeritus of Religion and Political Science,
Bucknell University. Author of Solidarity
and Suffering: Toward a Politics of
Relationality (1998), Belonging
Together: Faith and Politics in a Relational
World (2003).

Endorsement of The
New Pearl Harbor: "That 9/11 has
become a defining moment in our history cannot be
gainsaid. But its exact significance is an exceedingly
contentious question notwithstanding the seeming
clarity of prevailing accounts. David
Ray Griffin deconstructs those accounts with a
host of unresolved puzzles strongly suggestive of some
sort of culpable complicity by US officials in the
event. His book presents an incontrovertible argument
of the need for a genuinely full and independent
investigation of that infamous day." http://www.interlinkbooks.com/product_info.php?cPath=4_19&products_id=1326&osCsid=d14eda5b263a1fbb9f2785df48b28ef5

Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers
to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for
four things:

Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot
Spitzer

Immediate investigation in Congressional
hearings.

Media attention to scrutinize and investigate
the evidence.

The formation of a truly independent
citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

James Goulding, PhD

James Goulding, PhD
– Professor Emeritus of Religion and former
Vice President for Academic Affairs at MacMurray
College. Adjunct Member of Religious Studies Faculty at
Edgewood College.

Member: Muslim-Jewish-Christian
Alliance for 9/11 Truth, a group of scholars,
religious leaders and activists dedicated to uniting
members of the Jewish, Christian and Islamic faiths in
pursuit of 9/11 truth.

Bio: http://religst.edgewood.edu/FACULTY/Religious%20Studies%20Faculty.htm

Marjorie Hewitt Suchocki, PhD

Marjorie Hewitt Suchocki, PhD
– Professor Emerita of Theology and Co-director
of the Center for Process Studies at the Claremont
School of Theology. Considered one of the leading
philosophers of Process Theology. Former professor of
systematic theology and dean of Wesley Theological
Seminary. Visiting professor at Vanderbilt University in
1996 and 1999, and at the Ruprecht Karl University of
Heidelberg. Author of The
End of Evil (1988), God-Christ-Church:
A Practical Guide to Process Theology (1989),
The
Fall to Violence: Original Sin in Relational
Theology (1995), In
God's Presence: Theological Reflections on
Prayer (1996), The
Whispered Word: A Theology of Preaching (1999),
Divinity
and Diversity: A Christian Affirmation of Religious
Pluralism (2003).

Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers
to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for
four things:

Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot
Spitzer

Immediate investigation in Congressional
hearings.

Media attention to scrutinize and investigate
the evidence.

The formation of a truly independent
citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marjorie_Hewitt_Suchocki

CV: http://www.ctr4process.org/about/CoDirectors/mhs_cv.pdf

Rev. David P. Polk, PhD

Rev. David P. Polk, PhD –
Former Vice President of Christian Board of Publication
and Editor-in-Chief of Chalice Press 1990 - 2003 (ret).
Former Harold Glen Brown Associate Professor of Pastoral
Ministry, Brite Divinity School, Texas Christian
University. Also taught at Lexington Theological
Seminary and at Coe, Mt. Mercy, and Drury Colleges.
Former Senior Pastor, First Christian Church (Disciples
of Christ), Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Author, co-author, and
editor of numerous books on religion, including; Chalice
Praise: Pew Edition (2004), Shaken
Foundations: Sermons from America's Pulpits After the
Terrorist Attacks (2001), You
Might Be a Disciple If (1997), And
the Angels Wept: From the Pulpits of Oklahoma City After
the Bombing (1995), Now
What's a Christian to Do? (1994), If
Only I Had Known: Dramatic Monologues for Advent and
Lent (1994), Partners
in Prayer (1996), Education
of the Practical Theologian (1990), On
the Way to God: An Exploration into the Theology of
Wolfhart Pannenberg (1988).

Review of Christian
Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11 10/9/06:
"Discovering the courage to confront a
demonic American empire This is truly two books
in one. Each half is vitally important to all
Americans, but especially to those of us who wish to
be identified as Christians.

Part I explores
the question of how complicit members of the Bush
administration were in the tragedy of 9/11. ...

In Part I he [David
Ray Griffin] offers compelling evidence that 9/11
was an American "false flag" operation in which
previously planted explosives allowed the THREE towers
of the World Trade Center--including one building not
even struck by the passenger jets! [WTC
7] --to implode in the manner of controlled
demolitions. ... The point is that this is a vital
issue about which we Americans ought to be crying
loudly to be examined by some subsequent commission of
inquiry that will not simply gloss over or totally
ignore discrepancies, inconsistencies in testimony,
and unexamined facts." http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/AOETCS7L7CBT1/ref=cm_pdp_profile_reviews/105-8009672-4038058?tag=wanttinfo-20&ie=UTF8&sort%5Fby=MostRecentReview

Graeme MacQueen, PhD

Graeme MacQueen, PhD –
Associate Professor of Religious Studies and founding
Director, Centre for Peace Studies, McMaster University

Interview 11/19/06: "... there's
no way those 3 towers were brought down by planes, jet
fuel and fire. One tower, maybe. A structural flaw in
the tower, a set of coincidences. Two towers — we're
getting into a highly unlikely situation, even though
their construction was similar, because the planes hit
in different ways. Three towers (including WTC
7 now, which wasn't hit by a plane), the odds
against this are astronomical." http://americanbuddhist.net/node/3390

Essay 8/21/06: Regarding the
recorded oral accounts of 503 members of the Fire
Department of New York taken by the Department shortly
after 9/11. "Claims that explosions contributed to the
collapses were made on 9/11 and have persisted, but
studies supportive of the U.S. government's account of
events have ignored or denied these claims. ...

We begin by
facing the simple number of individual witnesses (118)
and the even greater number of references, direct or
indirect, in their accounts to explosions. We next
have to deal with the rich, mutually supportive detail
of these accounts. ... I cannot read this material
without being struck by the ways in which the
witnesses' testimony is not merely cumulative but
complementary and multidimensional. ...

It appears
(references are somewhat unclear) that the Commission
did, in fact, make fairly extensive use of the oral
histories. ... But what about all the references in
the FDNY material to explosions? The Report makes no
mention of them." http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Article_5_118Witnesses_WorldTradeCenter.pdf

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice

Bio: Appears at the end of the
article at http://americanbuddhist.net/node/3390

David Sprintzen, PhD
No photo
available

David Sprintzen, PhD –
Professor Emeritus of Philosophy and former Co-director,
Institute for Sustainable Development, C.W. Post College
at Long Island University. Founder and currently
Secretary of the Long Island Progressive Coalition.

Statement to this website 1/9/07:
"I believe there are many serious unanswered questions
about 9/11 that call out for a complete, independent
investigation, without pre-judging the results of such
an investigation. The official 9/11 Commission report
is not credible."

Member: Scholars for 9/11
Truth

Bio: BA from Queens College. MA
& Ph.D. from Penn State. Author of Camus;
A Critical Examination and Sartre
and Camus: A Historic Confrontation. Founder
and Co-Chair for 20 years, and currently Secretary of
the Long Island Progressive Coalition. Board member of
Citizen Action of New York. Founder and former
co-Director of the Institute for Sustainable
Development at Long Island University.

Kerry S. Walters,
PhD

Kerry S. Walters,
PhD – Professor of Philosophy
and Chair of the Department of Philosophy, Gettysburg
College. Co-founder of the Center for Nonviolent Living.
Director of PeaceWay: A Ministry of Christian
Nonviolence. Co-editor of Episcopal
Peace Witness the national quarterly of the Episcopal
Peace Fellowship. Author and editor of numerous
books on philosophy and ethics, including; Merciful
Meekness: Becoming A Spiritually Integrated
Person (2004), Finding
Perfect Joy With St. Francis of Assisi
(2002), Godlust:
Facing the Demonic, Embracing the Divine
(2000), Benjamin
Franklin and His Gods (1998), Re-Thinking
Reason - New Perspectives in Critical Thinking
(1994), Rational
Infidels: The American Deists (1992)

Review of The
New Pearl Harbor 3/17/04: "We ignore
this book at our peril. I've just spent an entire
night and part of a day rereading and rereading Professor
Griffin's thoroughly researched, judiciously
argued, and incredibly disturbing book. Griffin takes
on the task of investigating the official account of
the 9/11 attacks, asking questions that beg to be
asked,... analyzing possible scenarios, and asking
what kinds of evidence would properly address
unanswered questions.

Griffin invites
the reader to examine two possible explanations to
account for the inconsistencies: the "incompetence"
theory and the "complicity" theory. The former rests
on the assumption that stupid mistakes were made both
before and after the attack. The latter rests on the
assumption that false official accounts were made
about advance notice of the attacks and/or that
after-the-fact obstruction of investigations took
place. Griffin's conclusion is that it's reasonable to
suppose that complicity rather than incompetence is
the more likely explanation, and he painstakingly
makes his case by examining five major challenges to
the official version of what happened.

On the second
anniversary of 9/11, Donald Rumsfeld made the shocking
public claim that the attacks were really blessings
"in disguise." Rumsfeld's point was that the US was
motivated by the attacks to ramp up its military
strength. But if even part of Griffin's analysis is on
the money, the "blessing," which has led to great
subsequent loss of life and expenditures of monies in
Afghanistan and Iraq, is built on a deception. A
frightening, but not implausible, possibility." http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/1566565529/ref=cm_rev_next/105-8009672-4038058?tag=wanttinfo-20&ie=UTF8&customer-reviews.sort%5Fby=-HelpfulVotes&n=283155&s=books&customer-reviews.start=11

Bio: http://www.gettysburg.edu/academics/philosophy/employee_detail.dot?empId=20001637

John Milbank, PhD

John Milbank, PhD –
Professor in Religion, Politics, and Ethics, University
of Nottingham. Former Francis Ball Professor of
Philosophical Theology at the University of Virginia .
Author, co-author, and editor of numerous books on
philosophy and religion, including; Theology
and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason
(1993), The
Word Made Strange: Theology, Language and
Culture (1997), Radical
Orthodoxy: A New Theology (1998), Truth
in Aquinas (2000), Being
Reconciled: Ontology and Pardon (2003), Theological
Perspectives on God and Beauty (2003), The
Suspended Middle: Henri De Lubac And The Debate
Concerning The Supernatural (2005).

Essay 5/16/06: "As to the precise
causes of 9/11 I remain entirely agnostic. It
certainly appears that while certain strange
circumstances surrounding that event have been
satisfactorily explained, certain others have not been
accounted for in any unequivocally emphatic way (and
in particular the tardiness of response to the planes'
initial capture). Quite definitely we can say that on
the part of someone a terroristic conspiracy
was fomented and that who that someone really was is
not as yet entirely apparent.

I must stress
however, that there is as yet absolutely no clear
evidence for such a supposition and indeed that there
is every reason for scepticism in the face of it. But
on the other hand, there remains a case to answer and
the refusal of nearly all public organs to press this
point remains striking." MS Word doc located at http://www.theologyphilosophycentre.co.uk/papers/Milbank_GeopoliticalTheology.doc

Bio: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/theology/lookup/lookup_az.php?id=ODA0Nzc2&page_var=personal

Sean Kelly, PhD

Sean Kelly, PhD – Professor
of Philosophy and Religion, California Institute of
Integral Studies.

Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers
to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for
four things:

Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot
Spitzer

Immediate investigation in Congressional
hearings.

Media attention to scrutinize and investigate
the evidence.

The formation of a truly independent
citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Bio: http://www.ciis.edu/faculty/kelly.html

Jeffery D. Long, PhD
No photo available

Jeffery D. Long, PhD
– Associate Professor of Religion and Asian
Studies and Chair of Religious Studies, Elizabethtown
College, Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania.

Review of The
New Pearl Harbor 3/23/04: "David
Ray Griffin, long known for his contributions to
the fields of philosophy and theology, turns his
logical mind and keen powers of analysis on the
official story of the events of 9/11 and finds it,
frankly, incredible.

Griffin has
performed an invaluable public service by writing this
book, and at no small risk to his reputation. By
exposing the flaws in the official version of these
events he raises the possibility that mainstream
journalists find too terrible to contemplate: that
elements of the U.S. government, and possibly even the
President, were complicit in bringing these events
about.

To
those (and they are many) who would dismiss such a
suggestion out of hand, I would recommend taking this
book seriously. Griffin is no wild-eyed fanatic, and
one could not accuse of him of making unwarranted
logical leaps. He treats this topic with the same care
and rational rigor exhibited in his philosophical
works. This book is not so much an indictment of the
Bush Administration as a call for a serious public
investigation (and not a mere whitewash) of events
that have been used to justify unprecedented
infringements upon the civil liberties of Americans at
home and imperial adventures abroad.

Ultimately, such
an investigation (were it ever to occur) would likely
lead to impeachment. If the evidence points in the
direction that Griffin's analysis suggests, the
current government of the United States is guilty of
the highest crimes imaginable. It is vital to our
democracy that this book receive the widest possible
readership, and that the public demand answers to
these questions." http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A3HWLIDQCG5DNI/ref=cm_pdp_profile_reviews/105-8009672-4038058?tag=wanttinfo-20&ie=UTF8&sort%5Fby=MostRecentReview

Bio: http://www.etown.edu/Directory.aspx?faculty=9f0f5bea-dd28-4ab6-911d-3374aea1734c

James Fetzer, PhD

James Fetzer, PhD –
Distinguished McKnight University Professor Emeritus of
Philosophy at the University of Minnesota. Former
Captain, U.S. Marine Corps. He has published more than
100 articles and reviews and authored, co-authored, and
edited over 20
books on the philosophy of science, the theory of
knowledge, and the theoretical foundations of computer
science, artificial intelligence, and cognitive science,
including: Computers
and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines
(2002) and The
Evolution of Intelligence (2004).

Essay 9/11: Rational Beliefs are not
Paranoid 12/8/06:
"The impact of the
planes cannot have caused enough damage to bring the
[World Trade Center] buildings down, since the
buildings were designed to withstand them (as Frank
De Martini, the project manager, has observed),
the planes that hit were very similar to those they
were designed to withstand, and they continued to
stand after those impacts with negligible effects. ...

WTC-7
came down in a classic controlled demolition at 5:20
PM/ET after Larry Silverstein suggested the best thing
to do might be to "pull it", displaying all the
characteristics of classic controlled demolitions: a
complete, abrupt, and total collapse into its own
footprint, where the floors are all falling at the
same time, and so forth, an event so embarrassing to
the official account that it is not even mentioned in
THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT.

There are more,
especially about the alleged hijackers, including that
they were not competent to fly the planes and their
names were not on any passenger manifest. Several have
turned up alive and well and living in the Middle
East. The government has not even produced their
tickets as evidence." http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/911RationalBeliefs.html

Co-founder: Scholars for 9/11
Truth

Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Fetzer

James K.
Powell II, PhD
No photo available

James K. Powell II,
PhD – Visiting Assistant
Professor, Buddhist Studies, Department of the Languages
and Cultures of Asia, University of Wisconsin.

Essay: Regarding the 9/11 attack
on the World Trade Center:
"... having seen some 12
times the
collapse of Building 7 throughout these videos, it
has dawned upon me what a dupe I have been. Everyone
has been. The DVD captures news anchors and experts at
the time commenting at how like a demolition job the
destruction seemed. In the videos we see an official
deciding whether to "pull it" meaning Building 7. From
whatever source, I urge skeptics to watch building 7
just make a free fall. Compare the destruction of
these buildings with that of the Madrid Hotel that
raged with fires but still did not fall.

It is up to
citizens to investigate the smoke that points to the
fire. As Franklin indicated, those who would trade
freedom for security deserve neither." http://mujca.com/powell.htm

[Editor's note:
WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories,
and was not hit by an airplane. It would have been the
tallest building in 33 states. However, no mention of
its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's
"full and complete account of the circumstances
surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks." Watch the collapse video here.
And 5 1/2 years after 9/11, the Federal government has
yet to publish its promised final report that explains
the cause of its collapse.]

Robert Merrill, PhD
No photo
available

Robert Merrill, PhD –
Professor of Literature and Humanities, Maryland
Institute College of Art. Founder and director of the
Institute for Advanced Cultural Studies. Editor,
Maisonneuve Press.

Member: Scholars for 9/11
Truth Association Statement: "Research proves
the current administration has been dishonest about
what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The
World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down
by controlled demolitions and that the available
relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the
government's official story about the attack on the
Pentagon."

Bio: http://www.mica.edu/FACULTY_DIRECTORY/index.cfm?faculty_id=215

William A. Cook, PhD

William A. Cook, PhD
– Professor of English, University of La Verne.
Author of Tracking
Deception: Bush Mid-East Policy.

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization
consisting of independent researchers and activists
engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11
attacks."

Bio: http://www.drwilliamacook.com/

John Albert Dragstedt, PhD

John Albert Dragstedt, PhD
– Professor of Classics and Philosophy, St.
Mary's College of California.

Member: Scholars for 9/11
Truth Association Statement: "Research proves
the current administration has been dishonest about
what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The
World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down
by controlled demolitions and that the available
relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the
government's official story about the attack on the
Pentagon."

Derrill Bodley

Derrill Bodley (1945 - 2005) –
Professor of Music, University of the Pacific. Father of
Deora
Bodley, passenger on United Flight 93.

Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers
to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for
four things:

Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot
Spitzer

Immediate investigation in Congressional
hearings.

Media attention to scrutinize and investigate
the evidence.

The formation of a truly independent
citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Raymond Munro, MAH

Raymond Munro, MAH
– Professor of Theatre, Clark University.

Member: Scholars for 9/11
Truth Association Statement: "Research proves
the current administration has been dishonest about
what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The
World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down
by controlled demolitions and that the available
relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the
government's official story about the attack on the
Pentagon."

Bio: http://www.clarku.edu/academiccatalog/facultybio.cfm?id=27

Clare Brandabur, PhD

Clare Brandabur, PhD –
Assistant Professor, English Literature, Dogus
University.

Statement to this website
1/12/07: "When I first watched the
mesmerizing pictures of the collapse of the Twin
Towers and Building
Number 7, my reaction was a kind of numb disbelief
which later gave way to a perception of the whole
event as an elaborately staged piece of theatre.
...

But it
had to be made to look like an attack by Arab/Islamic
terrorists. Many researchers have now shown how the
so-called hijackers were set up as a cover for the
real professional state-terrorists who actually
coordinated the attacks. ...

Although I have
spoken to people who fear what will happen if the
public at large finds out the truth, I believe that
dismantling the 9/11 hoax and exposing to public view
the real perpetrators is essential for salvaging
American democracy. Link
to full statement

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization
consisting of independent researchers and activists
engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11
attacks."

Bio: http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/authors.php?auid=1579

Bryan
Sacks

Bryan Sacks
– Adjunct Professor, Department of English and
Philosophy, Drexel University. Contributing author
to Elsevier's The
Hidden History of 9/11 ("The Compromised 9-11
Commission").

Essay 6/26/04: "... several FBI
"street-level" investigations into the activities of
the 9/11 terrorists were stymied by higher-ups in the
weeks prior to 9/11, each under strange circumstances,
and well before the street-level agents felt like they
had reached their "logical end". ...

1) Ken Williams
of the Phoenix FBI office sent a now-famous July 10,
2001 memo to the counterterrorism division of the FBI
suggesting that the organization institute a national
program to keep tabs on suspicious flight-school
students. ... Williams ... also warned of a possible
"effort by Osama bin Laden to send students to the US
to attend civil aviation universities and colleges"
... His suggestion for a national program was ignored
before 9/11;

2) FBI agent
Robert Wright of the Chicago field office, who had
been investigating a suspected terrorist cell for
three years, was informed in January 2001 that the
case was being closed. This despite Wright's
contention that his case was growing stronger. ...

Three
months before September 11, Wright wrote a stinging
internal memo charging that the FBI was not interested
in thwarting a terrorist attack, but rather "was
merely gathering intelligence so they would know who
to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred." ...

3) Legal officer
Colleen
Rowley worked in the FBI's Minneapolis field
office when agents arrested Zacarias Moussaoui in
August of 2001. ... The Minneapolis [office] felt so
strongly about the need to detain him that a request
was sent to FBI headquarters to search Moussaoui's
laptop computer under the Federal Intelligence
Surveillance Act.

Approximately
10,000 requests under FISA over the past 20 years had
been made without a single request being turned down,
but the Minneapolis agency's request never got out of
the FBI. ... the request was never forwarded for FISA
consideration, spurring Rowley to charge that the FBI
was "sabotaging" the case, and another agent to charge
that headquarters was "setting this up for failure."
...

4) On
Aug 28, 2001 the New York FBI office requested opening
a criminal investigation in soon-to-be hijacker Khalid
Almihdhar based on evidence he had been involved in
the USS Cole bombing. The request was turned down, on
the basis that, as Griffin
puts it, "Almihdhar could not be tied to the Cole
investigation without the inclusion of sensitive
intelligence information." This led one frustrated FBI
agent to write in an email that "someday someone will
die--and. . . the public will not understand why we
were not more effective."...

There are several
other aspects about the FBI's behavior pre- and
post-9/11 that scream out for further investigation."
http://www.counterpunch.org/sacks06262004.html

Four Arrows, aka
Don Trent Jacobs, EdD,
PhD

Four Arrows, aka Don Trent Jacobs,
EdD, PhD – Professor of Educational Leadership,
Fielding Graduate University. Associate Professor,
Department of Teaching and Learning, Northern Arizona
University. Former Dean of Education, Oglala Lakota
College. Former U.S. Marine Corps officer. Author of 12
books, including Primal
Awareness and Teaching Virtues:
Building Character Across the Curriculum; lead
author American
Assassination: The Strange Death of Senator Paul
Wellstone. Editor of the University of Texas
Press text, Unlearning
the Language of Conquest. Contributing author
to Elsevier's The
Hidden History of 9/11 ("The Military
Exercises of 9/11: Bizarre Coincidence or Something
Else?").

Statement to this website 1/9/07:
"Available evidence casts grave doubt on the
government's official story about what happened on and
before September 11, 2001, and it should be the
responsibility of every world citizen to bring forth
the truth."

Member: Scientific Panel
Investigating Nine-Eleven Association Statement:
"We have found solid scientific grounds on which to
question the interpretation put upon the events of
September 11, 2001 by the Office of the President of
the United States of America and subsequently
propagated by the major media of western nations."

Member: Scholars for 9/11
Truth Association Statement: "Research proves
the current administration has been dishonest about
what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The
World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down
by controlled demolitions and that the available
relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the
government's official story about the attack on the
Pentagon."

Bio: http://www.fielding.edu/elc/faculty/jacobs.htm

Lt. Col. Stephen L. Butler, EdD

No photo available

Lt. Col. Stephen L. Butler, EdD,
U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former Vice Chancellor
for Student Affairs at the Defense Language Institute.
Served as a B-52 Radar Navigator in the Gulf War.
24-year Air Force career.

Article 6/4/02: "Of course Bush
knew about the impending attacks on America. He did
nothing to warn the American people because he needed
this war on terrorism." http://www.truthout.org/docs_02/06.06E.butler.bush.htm

David Gabbard, EdD

David Gabbard, EdD
– Professor, College of Education, East
Carolina University. Editor, Public
Resistance, an Academic Journal to Confront the Lies of
the Right

Statement to this website 1/8/07:
"The truth about 9-11 is that we do not know the truth
about 9-11. Our government does not want us to know
the truth about 9-11. If you want to know the truth
about 9-11, then please help us lift the gag order
that former Attorney General John Ashcroft placed on
former FBI translator, Sibel
Edmonds, and call for a truly independent
investigation of the information contained in the
documents she translated while working for the Federal
Bureau of Investigation after 9-11.

She said, "If
they were to do real investigations we would see
several significant high level criminal prosecutions
in this country. And that is something that they are
not going to let out. And, believe me; they will do
everything to cover this up."

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization
consisting of independent researchers and activists
engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11
attacks."

Bio: http://web.mac.com/publicresistance/iWeb/Doc%20G/David%20Gabbard.html

Walter E. Davis, PhD
No photo available

Walter E. Davis, PhD
– Associate Professor, College of Education,
Health and Human Services, Kent State University.

Essay
"September 11th And The
Bush Administration - Compelling Evidence for
Complicity" 8/31/03:
"As I outline below, there are numerous
aspects regarding the official stories about September
11th which do not fit with known facts, which
contradict each other, which defy common sense, and
which indicate a pattern of misinformation and
coverup. ...

In this article,
I outline twenty-two items of evidence and questions,
each one sufficient reason to demand an investigation
into why September 11th was not prevented. Together,
these items suggest that the most plausible
explanation of events is that the Bush Administration
was complicit in the terrorist attacks. This should be
a national and international scandal." http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4582.htm

Member: Scientific Panel
Investigating Nine-Eleven Association Statement:
"We have found solid scientific grounds on which to
question the interpretation put upon the events of
September 11, 2001 by the Office of the President of
the United States of America and subsequently
propagated by the major media of western nations."

Bio: http://physics911.ca/org/modules/cjaycontent/index.php?id=8

Norma Carr-Rufino, PhD

Norma
Carr-Rufino, PhD – Professor of Management, San
Francisco State University. Member of the editorial
board of the international scholarly journal Women in
Management Review. Lay referee of the California State
Bar Court. Business consultant to Safeway International,
Hearst New Media & Technology, Bechtel Power,
Pearson Educacion, International Association of
Administrative Professionals, Texas Business Education
Association, University of Colorado, University of South
Carolina, Deere & Company and others. Author of
Managing Diversity, Building Innovative
Skills, The Promotable Woman, Business
Students Guide, The Innovative Woman Diversity
Success Strategies, and Making Diversity
Work.

Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers
to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for
four things:

Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot
Spitzer

Immediate investigation in Congressional
hearings.

Media attention to scrutinize and investigate
the evidence.

The formation of a truly independent
citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Bio: http://cob.sfsu.edu/cob/directory/faculty_profile.cfm?facid=23

Jesus Nieto, PhD

Jesus Nieto, PhD –
Associate Professor, School of Teacher Education, San
Diego State University.

Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and
Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for
9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization
consisting of independent researchers and activists
engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11
attacks."

Richard W. Behan, PhD

Richard W. Behan, PhD
– Professor Emeritus of
Natural Resource Policy and Dean Emeritus of the School
of Forestry, Northern Arizona University 1975 - 1993.
Former Professor of Natural Resource Policy, University
of Montana. Former Member of the Board of Directors of
the Forest History Society, American Forestry
Association, and Council of Forestry School Executives.
Author of nearly 100 articles and papers on public land
management, economics, and politics. Author of Plundered
Promise (2001) and Ecology,
Economics, Environment (1971).

Essay 12/3/06: "The controversies
rage on yet today about the events of 9/11. No steel
building has ever collapsed from fire alone. Buildings
falling precisely into their footprints are the marks
of deliberate (and expert) demolition. The collapse of
a third building that was not hit at all. The
short-selling of airline stock in previous days. The
Pentagon hit by a missile, not a civilian
airliner.

The smokescreen
includes the coverup of the 9/11 attacks on the Trade
Towers and the Pentagon. Initially and fiercely
resisting any inquiry at all, President Bush finally
appoints a 10-person "9/11 Commission." Its report
places the blame on "faulty intelligence." President
Bush and Vice President Cheney ... are not required to
testify under oath, and they need not even testify
separately. At the insistence of the White House, they
are "interviewed" together in the Oval Office, with no
transcription permitted.

We need to know
the truth and all the truth. The time has come, as
well as the opportunity, for formal, Congressional
investigations, based on subpoenas, sworn testimony,
and direct evidence about 9/11 and about the created
reality of the "war on terror." If such inquiries
clearly exonerate the Bush Administration, the nation
can breathe deeply and go on. If they do not, then but
only then should impeachment be undertaken." http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1203-21.htm

Bio: http://www.rockisland.com/~rwbehan/author.html

Eric Karlstrom, PhD

Eric Karlstrom, PhD –
Professor of Geography, California State University,
Stanislaus. Former Professor of Geography at Northern
Arizona University and The University of Kansas. Author
or co-author of 23 professional papers on soils,
geomorphology, and paleoclimate which have been
published in peer-reviewed national and international
journals. Author of 20 additional papers which have
appeared in non-refereed journals, guidebooks, and
books. Director and composer of the documentary film
An
Awakening Journey - Songs and Voices from the
Earth (2006). Composer,
recording artist and performer (piano, guitar, banjo
and vocals) of nine CDs.

75-page monograph 9/11 Was an Inside
Job and a "Psy-Op" 9/20/06:
"While overwhelming evidence indicates 9/11
was an inside job, even the FBI now admits that no
credible evidence points to Osama bin Laden and the 19
alleged "terrorists" as perpetrators. No trial or
impartial investigation of the crime has yet occurred.
In fact, the official 9/11 story, that 19 alleged
hijackers with box-cutters fooled the best
military/defense system in the world, is itself an
outrageous conspiracy theory. Certainly these
men, at least six of whom are still alive, lacked the
motivation and the ability to carry out the attacks by
themselves. Certainly, 9/11 was not an "intelligence
failure," as the government/media complex has
characterized it. Rather, 9/11 was an elaborate hoax,
a staged "war pretext incident," engineered
to fool the American people into accepting wars of
aggression abroad as well as a rollback of their civil
liberties. As such, 9/11 is a typical example of
"state-sponsored, false-flag terrorism" and a
covert, "black op" orchestrated by rogue
elements within the U.S. government. It is
"false-flag" because it was blamed on a
political target group, the Muslims." MS Word doc at
http://erickarlstrom.com/Articles/9-11wasaninsidejobanda_.doc

Website: http://erickarlstrom.com/index.html

9/11 is
unquestionably the most important event in American
history since December 7, 1941, when Japanese forces
attacked Pearl Harbor. The magnitude of its impact on
America and the world cannot be overstated. The terrible
acts of 9/11 and the events leading up to them deserve a
thorough and unimpeachable investigation to learn the
facts. And if some rogue elements within the U.S.
government were complicit in the terrorist attacks on
the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on 9/11, as
several of these individuals allege, it is critical that
these elements be exposed and removed from power.

Note of
acknowledgement: Most of this excellent data
was compiled by Alan Miller. For the latest version of
this chart on his website: http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html.
Please note that most of the individuals listed above
are not affiliated with this website.

A PERSONAL
NOTE ABOUT THIS WEBPAGE FROM ALAN MILLER

I believed the official
explanation of 9/11 for four and one-half years. I
remember, during that time, becoming angry at news
stories about people who challenged that explanation.
However, in the Spring of 2006, I saw the documentary,
Loose
Change, on the Internet. Although not entirely
objective, it raised many serious and disturbing
questions about the events of 9/11 that I had previously
simply accepted without much critical thought.

And so I began a several
month period of researching the events of 9/11. I found
a great deal of material challenging the 9/11 Commission
Report on web sites like 911truth.org, physics911.net, Scholars for 9/11 Truth
and many others. I attended a lecture by Prof.
David Ray Griffin. I learned much about what has
become known as the 9/11 Truth Movement.

My objective, at this
point, is to have our government launch a new, extremely
thorough and impartial re-examination of the terrible
acts of 9/11 and the events leading up to them. In my
opinion, and in the opinion of the above listed
experienced individuals, the current 9/11 Commission
Report is seriously inadequate in explaining what really
happened.

For the sake of
those who died on 9/11, their families, the American
people, and for the sake of peace in the world, please
continue to seek the truth about 9/11. Demand a thorough
and impartial reinvestigation of 9/11.

Write or call your elected
representatives in Congress. http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/index.html
or
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/directory/congdir.tt

Write or call national newspapers,
radio, and television.
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=111

Write or call your local newspapers
and media.
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/media/

Sincerely,

Alan Miller
Email: [email-masked]

LINKS TO RELIABLE
9/11 RESOURCES, 9/11 COMMISSION WEBSITE

9/11
Truth Websites

Free
9/11 Videos

9/11
Commission Defenders

9/11
Families

9/11
Information Center

9/11:
Press For Truth

9-11Commission.gov

Families
of September 11

Complete
9/11 Timeline

Loose
Change

Nat.
Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST)

Peaceful
Tomorrows

ScholarsforTruth911.org

Prof.
Griffin on C-SPAN

Popular
Mechanics

Sept. 11
Families Assoc.

911Truth.org

9/11
Mysteries

WTC
United Family Group

Physics911.net

Painful
Deceptions

PentagonResearch.com

September 11
Revisited

Veterans for 9/11 Truth

911
Eyewitness

911blogger.com

Final
Note: WantToKnow.info believes it is important to
balance disturbing cover-up information with inspirational
writings which call us to be all that we can be and to work
together for positive change. Please visit our Inspiration
Center at http://www.WantToKnow.info/inspirational
for an abundance of uplifting material.

See
our archive of revealing news articles at www.WantToKnow.info/indexnewsarticles

Your
tax-deductible donations, however large or small, help greatly
to support this important work.
To make a donation by
credit card, check, or money order: www.WantToKnow.info/donationswtk

Explore
the mind and heart expanding websites managed by the nonprofit
PEERS network:

http://www.peerservice.org/ - PEERS
websites: Spreading inspiration, education, &
empowerment
http://www.momentoflove.org/ - Every person
in the world has a heart
http://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/ -
Dynamic online courses powerfully expand your horizons
http://www.wanttoknow.info/ - Reliable,
verifiable information on major cover-ups
http://www.weboflove.org/ - Strengthening
the Web of Love that interconnects us all

To
respond to this message, visit www.WantToKnow.info/contactus.php
To
subscribe to or unsubscribe from the WantToKnow.info list (one
email every few days):
www.WantToKnow.info/subscribe

Over
100 Professors Question 9/11 Commission Report

Overwhelmed by this material? Click here

Top of
page  |  Home
|  Spread
the Word  |  News  |
What You Can Do
|  About Us
|  Contact
Us  |  Donate